Re: [NEWS] RTD has no idea if Billie Piper is the next Doctor

On Tue, 8 Jul 2025 13:00:59 +0000, Mark wrote:

Werner Pichler wrote:
>

Mark <Pammiesheart@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Werner Pichler wrote:
>

On 05.07.2025 22:18, Mark wrote:

Werner Pichler wrote:
>

>
Let’s vote on a Top 6 from the remaining teams.
Looking forward to it!
>
Ciao,
Werner

>
Are you serious or are you just messing me around?

>
Both.

>
Well please don't mess me around.

>
Why not? It’s just a pointless list in a venerable but
half-forgotten corner of the internet.

>
It's not pointless. It would be a fun, interesting and informative
discussion if you and Blueshirt didn't spoil it.

LURKING HERE AND READING THIS THREAD SHOWS ME YOU ARE JUST BEING
STUBBORN AND REFUSE TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT ANYBODY ELSE'S OPINIONS.

The whole point of the thread was to compile a list that nobody
strongly disagrees with. If there's a team in it that someone
strongly disagrees with, then we won't achieve that. If the vote
produces a list that includes a team that has been strongly
disagreed with then the vote is a waste of time. So it's pointless
including those teams in the vote.

>
Actually, in that case it’s pointless having a list.
Your whole methodology is flawed.

>
And yet nobody has come up with a better way. If anybody does, they're
free to start their own thread.

A VOTE IS THE MOST DEMOCRATIC WAY - OPEN TO EVERY TEAM.

What have you got against a list that nobody strongly disagrees
with?

>
I’ve told you before, I strongly disagree with the
dishonest way you’ve been conducting this, and
I’m not the only one.

>
It's not dishonest. I've been open and fair right from the start.

I MUST HAVE MISSED THAT PART

Anyway they're not my 2 options.

>
Yes, it is. Option B. No list. I’ll veto everything.

>
Then why should I take you seriously? The evidence suggests you're just
messing me around and don't really strongly disagree with those teams.
>
Please will you stop messing me around and let me know whether you
really do strongly disagree with the teams you've said you strongly
disagree with?

I STRONGLY DISAGREE.

1 of my other options is to stop being lenient with the deadlines and
dismiss your strong disagreement. As I want this to be as accurate a
representation of the views of rssers as possible (and that desire
seems to be what you're counting on for your messing me around to
work), I'd prefer not to be too strict with deadlines though. If I
decide that that's my best option, I'm willing to settle for the list
we've already got though.

NOT SURE YOU ARE GETTING MUCH AGREEMENT FROM ANYONE.

I'm not applying my veto on the teams I dislike anymore than
Futbolmetrix was applying his veto on a team he dislikes when he
strongly disagreed with the inclusion of Inter. If Michael is MH he
already has 'applied his veto' on Bayern Munchen. I've accepted 3
teams that I think are among the top 10 best teams ever not being
included.  There's nothing unreasonable about expecting other
people to accept 1 team that they think should be included not
being included. I've treated everyone fairly.
>
It's not as if I deliberately designed it so that I could exclude
teams that I personally strongly disagree with. I had as little
idea that this is the way things would turn out as everyone else
did.

>
Yes you did, and from the beginning. You were
adamant about no English teams and haven’t moved
an inch despite strong disagreement on every side.

>
No I didn't. I've never said anything suggesting English teams weren't
allowed. Blueshirt may have said that, I've never even hinted at that
ridiculous bias.

THAT'S GOOD: I VOTE FOR MANCHESTER UNITED THEN.

So fair’s fair. I’ll do the same for the South American
teams except Santos.
>

>
After all, Liberum Veto already destroyed the Polish-Lithuanian
Commonwealth, it won't stop short of your paltry list.
>
>

>
What's Liberum Veto?
>

>
Look it up in Wikipedia. It's a very good web-site.

>
For clarification for everyone else: Independiente, Penarol and Boca
Juniors are all still available for nomination until further notice,
just in case anyone was unsure whether to nominate them or not.
Hopefully we can resolve this amicably.

I STRONGLY DIDSAGEE WITH YOUR LIST.
AND I WOULD LIKE TO NOMINATE 'MANCHESTER UNITED FC' FOR INCLUSION,
THAT'S THE SIR ALEX FERGUSON ERA OF MULTIPLE LEAGUE TITLES (13) FA CUPS
(6) EUROPEAN CUPS (2) AND INTER-CONTINENTAL/CLUB WORLD CUPS. (2)
THEY ARE MORE DESEVING OF A PLACE ON THE LIST THAN LIVERPOOL.
I WOULD PUT LIVERPOOL AHEAD OF PENAROL OR BOCA JUNIORS IN A TOP TEN LIST
THO.
--
https://www.theory11.com/