Sujet : Re: Genesis of the Humans
De : YourName (at) *nospam* YourISP.com (Your Name)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwhoDate : 11. Jul 2025, 23:46:14
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <104s47m$1o2q0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Unison/2.2
On 2025-07-11 08:50:12 +0000, solar penguin said:
The asswipe asked:
In article <104phpg$13qni$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The asswipe asked:
In article <104ogfe$spvv$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
That’s why I tried to keep my choices to books that are in
*all* versions of Christianity.
What about
Matthew of the Daleks?
If you’re going to include proper names, start with Joshua and
continue from there.
What about Judges of the Daleks?
What about it? Judges isn’t a personal name. You don’t get
people called Judges Smith or Judges Brown, do you?
(Anyway, I already said that one.)
"Judges" perhaps not. It depends on local laws around names of babies, but in some places (mainly USA and UK) there are people with the name "Judge" as either a forename or a surname.
<
https://www.ancestry.com/first-name-meaning/judge>
Genesis of the Humans
Re: Genesis of the Humans
