Re: The Lime sock on Stephan Pickering and NAMBLA

On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 16:31:49 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:

>

The me the problem with Stephan Pickering posting here on the poetry
newsgroup was the determination of Jim Senetto and Michael Pendragon to
drive him away at any cost, and they both tried to strongarm me into
joining them with this hostile agenda.
>
When I refused to participate, both Michael Pendragon and Jim Senetto
then turned on me with malicious attacks, even threats of violence, that
lasted for many years.
>
And so it goes.

>
I call

You lie and misrepresent, Pendragon.
As always.

Jim Senetto turned on you when you scammed him out of $50.00.

That's a lie and misrepresentation you created then and continue to lie
about.
Jim Senetto sent $50 to Zod, not me.
I did, however, refund the $50 to Senetto twice, meaning Senetto got
$100 back for his $50.
To correct your lies and misrepresentations and set the record straight
one more time.

How you can even claim that his dislike of you had anything to do with
Pickering

That's exactly how it started.
You and Senetto tried to force me to join y'all in attempting to drive
Stephan Pickering from the poetry newsgroup.
When I refused to join you, y'all tried to kick me out of the newsgroup
as well.
Lie and deny all you want, that's what happened, Pendragon.

As for me, there's a world of difference between refusing to participate
in a flame war, and supporting Pick's claim that I was a paedophile.
>
My turning on you after that should be as easy for anyone to understand
as is Jim's turning on you after you scammed him.
>
When you scam your friends out of money, and attempt to label them as
paedophiles, you should expect them to "turn on you" in as a result.
>
--