Re: The Return of Michael Monkey

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 12:32:52 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 2:27:28 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
>

On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 23:54:22 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
>

George J. Dance wrote:
>

On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 7:40:51 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
>

On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 21:00:16 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

>
from
https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=253903&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#253903
>
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:22:04 +0000, Michael Monkey aka "HarryLime"
wrote:

>

MMP: My literary journal was created to highlight the best examples of
poetry from AAPC's various members.  The best poetry by Member G does
not necessarily measure up to the best poetry of Member J.
>
As Mr. Dance has so ably demonstrated above, his own poem left no traces
on my memory.

>
MMP's memory lapses are something I'm sure we're all familiar with by
now. But let us remember what else I just ably demonstrated: that back
in 2021 (when he was still hoping to recruit me as an ally) he
considered Possibilities one of "the best examples of poetry" on AAPC.

>
This deserves an underscore as an example of Michael Pendragon's biased
behavior.

>
Indeed. I'm not sure if you remeber that statement of his that I called
a statement of his editorial philosophy:
>
<quote>
"You divide everyone into two categories: potential allies and potential
adversaries. You slurp the writings of your potential allies and attack
those of your potential adversaries."
>
"When [someone] Jim is seen as a potential ally, you request his poetry.
When he
is seen as an adversary, you assign a childish name to him and claim he
can't write." </q>
>
source text:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.arts.poetry.comments/c/hDYKsC5l5Ew/m/IR5NzWPJBQAJ?hl=en
>
That also fully describes his critical philosophy. No more need be said,
but it can't be said often enough.
>
snip

>
In other words, Michael Pendragon is basically a two faced liar.

>
Well, not exactly, It means he comes across as no different from a
two-faced liar, but I think his mental state is more complex than that I
should open a new threat where we can talk about that.

>
Sounds good, and to avoid confusion with new readers, from now on I'll
just refer to Pendragon by his new chosen alias Harry Lime.

That's a good point. Personally I do not like calling socks by their
aliases puppets by their sock names; that also can be confusing, as it's
meant to be. So I've started calling the person behind all those socks
MMP for Michael Monkey Peabrain (or just Peabrain if he says something
really stupid, or Lying Michael whenever I catch him in a lie). But that
could also be confusing for new readers and casual readers, so I think
I'll have to refer to him, when talking to third parties, as something
else; something that will identify whom I mean to any new or casual
readers.
After some thought, I've settled on "the Lime sock" - what do you think?
https://www.zazzle.ca/lime_green_socks-256240956281961664?rf=238512069961476072&tc=CjwKCAiA-ty8BhA_EiwAkyoa3_aFWzdIrL7epsnGiUBOmwWKHVyTWv2DT3XULBaoBmZv8YkfovgQhRoC6i8QAvD_BwE&z_ca=20390696811&z_dev=c&z_nw=x&z_lp=9000899&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAiA-ty8BhA_EiwAkyoa3_aFWzdIrL7epsnGiUBOmwWKHVyTWv2DT3XULBaoBmZv8YkfovgQhRoC6i8QAvD_BwE&trchd=true

And so it goes.
>
🙂