Re: The Lime sock on Stephan Pickering and NAMBLA

On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 4:51:37 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 16:49:20 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
>

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:39:15 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain (MMP) aka
"HarryLime" wrote:

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 16:15:50 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:23:41 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain (MMP) aka
"HarryLime"aka "HarryLime" wrote:

On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 0:13:13 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

>

My reason for opening a new thread would be because you're constantly
bringing up my poem in unrelated threads, as per your M.O. which I
already noted. (As that contained a few typos), I'll copy it in here:
>
"That's been your regular M.O. since you showed up. Whenever I try to
have
a conversation with Will, about anything, you jump in and start spewing
false claims about something else, in the mistaken belief that I'd only
have two options:
(1) try to refute your false claims, in which case you've successfully
disrupted the conversation; or
(2) ignore them (in which some people might think those false claims of
yours are actually true)."

>
When you're having a conversation *about me*, you mean to say, deceitful
George.
>
If you make false statements about me on a social media platform
(libel), you should expect, at very least, a refutation.

>
I opened this thread to respond to false statements you were making
about your flame war on Stephan, Will, myself, and others on other
threads. No one has said it wasn't about you.

>
It's history, and certain aspects of that decade long flame war haven't
been documented.

A nutter in a Usenet group that had no more than a dozen members at any
given time is not history, Donkey.

To save time, why don't you just bump the old thread up to the top of
the feed?

>
Not all old threads are available on Nova BBS or JLA Forums.
>
Thus, new thread is easily the best option.

It's the best option for Pickles.  A new thread allows you to pretend
that he wasn't a pathologically lying, delusional nut-job.  But
rewriting the past isn't going to change it.  And the old Usenet posts
aren't going away any time soon.

>

Rereading it requires much less time on both our parts than repeating
the same points that we'd made at the time.

>
It takes time but that's Usenet newsgroups for you.

No, that's Will Donkey for you.

>

HarryLiar, no one is asking you to comment on that thread (or any of the
other threads I've opened FTM).

>
Exactly, you don't need our permission to sit this one out, Pendragon.
>
If you have nothing to say on the poem,

you're more than welcome to sit that one out.

>
Exactly what I was thinking.
>

Since the Subject of this thread is "Re: The Lime sock on Stephan
Pickering and NAMBLA" (and since "The Lime sock[sic]" is the latest
childish name you have come up with to call me

>
After all the childish name-calling you've done over the last decade
you're going to whine about childish name-calling?
>
Oh, the hypocrisy...

Are you really *that* stupid, Donkey?
I'm saying that if the thread is about me, you cant expect me to "sit
that one out."

>

Ever the hypocrite here's Michael Pendragon whining about childish name
calling when he's the one who began that practice here years ago.

>
I'm not complaining about the name-calling

>
You sure seem to be, Harry.

Learn to read, Donkey.

>

I'm merely pointing out that "The Lime sock[sic]" is George Dance's
latest name for me.

>
We already know that, why bother to waste our time whining about it?
>

Get with the program. Precisely because of the whining about your
petname that Will mentioned, I changed it several days ago.

>
Pendragon the little green monkey boy?
>
😏
>

No, Lying Michael; this thread was a response to comments that you were
making about your flaming of Stephan (in another thread for deflection
purposes, as per your M.O.) You comments were quoted fairly and
accurately, not "reworded" in the slightest.

>
High time we documented that dark era of Usenet poetry newsgroups.

LOL.  You're delusional, Donkey.

>

You're welcome to talk about them here; but be warned that going
forward, if you attempt to deflect by talking about something else, your
comments will be snipped here, and moved to the appropriate thread where
necessary.

>
On that note, we probably need an Allen Ginsberg thread.
>

Mr. Dance was whining

>
Actually, you're the one whining, Harry/Pendragon.
>
As I pointed out a couple of paragraphs ago.
>

No, Lying Michael. I am "whining" about you (once again) immediately
trying to change the subject of the discussion to something else. Your
first comment in this thread was to call me a liar (presumably just for
preemption). Your second was a misrepresentation of something I'd said
in the "Psychology of MPP" thread which I'd already dealt with on that
thread, so you simply repeated it here. Your third comment contained
both a lie and a faked quote about my poem "My Father's House". (Both
the latter two have been moved to the "My Father's House" thread Will
opened, if you're willing to talk about them there.)

>
Which was actually derailed by Cujo's deflecting.
>

It's hardly a one-sided conversation, HarryLiar, when and all my posts
in it (including the OP) have been replies to you, and you've written
more posts in it than I have,  Please stop whining about being excluded
from it, since you obviously are not.

>
Correct.
>

Now you're supporting your earlier lie with fake quotes, which did not
come from anything I said, but came from you.
>

Tit for Tat is a concept that still seems to go over his head.
>
And so it goes.

>
Tit for Tat is a concept that I abandoned somewhere before having
attended Kindergarten.  Unfortunately, I cannot say the same for you and
George.

>
No, Lying Michael. You continually rely on the concept. You may not
believe in govern your own behavior by reciprocal ethics - there's no
sign that your behavior is governed by any ethics - but you clearly pay
lip service to T4T to try to justify your behavior.
>
For instance, every time that you "attack" (troll and flame) someone,
you try to justify it with a story (sometimes true, sometimes not) that
they attacked you first. That's been the gist of every one of your
on-topic statements about the Team Monkey flamewar; that you and your
team went after Stephan, Will, and myself because they "attacked" you
first.

>
And that's almost always a complete lie and misrepresentation by Harry
Lime aka Michael Pendragon.

The Usenet archives hold the truth, Donkey.  You can "document" things
here as much as you like, but it won't change a single thing.
--