Re: The Return of Michael Monkey

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 12:32:52 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:
>

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 2:27:28 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:
>

On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 23:54:22 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
>

George J. Dance wrote:
>

On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 7:40:51 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
>

On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 21:00:16 +0000, George J. Dance wrote:

>
from
https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=253903&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#253903
>
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:22:04 +0000, Michael Monkey aka "HarryLime"
wrote:

>

MMP: My literary journal was created to highlight the best examples of
poetry from AAPC's various members.  The best poetry by Member G does
not necessarily measure up to the best poetry of Member J.
>
As Mr. Dance has so ably demonstrated above, his own poem left no traces
on my memory.

>
MMP's memory lapses are something I'm sure we're all familiar with by
now. But let us remember what else I just ably demonstrated: that back
in 2021 (when he was still hoping to recruit me as an ally) he
considered Possibilities one of "the best examples of poetry" on AAPC.

>
This deserves an underscore as an example of Michael Pendragon's biased
behavior.

>
Indeed. I'm not sure if you remeber that statement of his that I called
a statement of his editorial philosophy:
>
<quote>
"You divide everyone into two categories: potential allies and potential
adversaries. You slurp the writings of your potential allies and attack
those of your potential adversaries."
>
"When [someone] Jim is seen as a potential ally, you request his poetry.
When he
is seen as an adversary, you assign a childish name to him and claim he
can't write." </q>
>
source text:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.arts.poetry.comments/c/hDYKsC5l5Ew/m/IR5NzWPJBQAJ?hl=en
>
That also fully describes his critical philosophy. No more need be said,
but it can't be said often enough.
>
snip

>
In other words, Michael Pendragon is basically a two faced liar.

>
Well, not exactly, It means he comes across as no different from a
two-faced liar, but I think his mental state is more complex than that I
should open a new threat where we can talk about that.

>
Sounds good, and to avoid confusion with new readers, from now on I'll
just refer to Pendragon by his new chosen alias Harry Lime.

>
Referring to one by their chosen alias is the considerate thing to do.
Much appreciated.
>
--