Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ra poems |
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 21:00:42 +0000, W.Dockery wrote:We know each other a few years earlier, at Carver High School.
>On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 20:39:26 +0000, HarryLime wrote:>
>On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 20:29:40 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:>HarryLime wrote:>Will Dockery wrote:Here's the original unedited version so the readers can decide for>
themselves:
>
***
>>I Met A Girl
>
I met a girl
she came from California.
It was in a dream
we knew each other instantly.
She was a little freckled girl
from out of
my high school past.
>
And she looked up at me
and talked real spacey.
I've forgotten her name
though she told it to me twice.
>
We talked
a really detached situation.
She said years ago
I was so shy
she thought I was gay.
At this point I kissed her
and put my finger to her hole.
>
And she looked up at me
and talked real spacey.
I have forgotten her name
though she told it to me twice.
>
I don't know why it was
that I would think of her.
I made a couple of puns
about her name that made me blush.
But her softness in tone
made me feel all right.
>
All I want to do
is get in contact.
>
-Will Dockery / May 8 1982
***
>
This poem was written in 1982, during my time in the Atlanta Georgia New
Wave punk rock scene, while also influenced by the earlier Beatnik poets
I was reading at the time, such as Allen Ginsberg, Jack Kerouac and
Charles Bukowski among others.
>
Both styles employed a sort of crude swagger in the tone and content
which I also used in many of my poems.
>
All apologies to those offended.
I suppose that's a start.
>
Of course, an apologize is supposed to include owning up to one's
mistake -- not attempting to justify it as beatnik inspired swagger.
>
You need to recognize that groping a woman you've just met is wrong.
Regardless of whether she's a punk rocker, or that you were acting under
the influence of beatnik poets. Groping is wrong
I didn't grope her.
>>>>You're misrepresenting the scene again, Pendragon. We were just having>
some fun, kissing and "making out" a little, as the young folks used to
call it.
>
Nothing as serious as you want to make it out to be.
>
HTH and HAND.
Your poem makes it out to be
No, that's just your misrepresentation of my poem, Pendragon.Mainly, you continue to lie and misrepresent, Harry.
>Answer my question
I did, and continue to.
>
See below:
>>Okay, see below for my answer.
>If you ran into some guy you'd barely known in high school
I know a lot of people from all walks of life, so such a meeting would
be welcome.
>
If of course give him a autographed copy of my poetry book.
>>Since that would be a completely different situation from the one in my>
poem there would have been a completely different outcome.
What's so different about it
You don't know the difference between straight and gay sex?
>
-- apart from the fact that you're the onegetting groped?>
>
I didn't grope anyone.
>-->
The events in my poem were consensual.
>
Look that word up, Harry.
"Consensual" is a label that you have applied to your poem in order to
justify the narrative to yourself.
>
Again, I'm asking you to consider how you would feel if you had been the
one getting groped.
>
That you gender identify as heterosexual is 100% beside the point.
>
When you have just met someone
you recognizedThat's correct.
their face from high school five years earlier),
you have no means ofYou might not have
determining what level
of sexual contact (if any) they're open toAgain, you might not, I could tell.
that particular time and placeNo, it was a "no brsiner" really.
Men often misread social cuesOften but not always.
from a woman, mistaking friendliness forThat's possible, and in such a case the person really needs to at least
flirting
Just because you were feeling attracted to herAnd the feeling was definitely mutual.
that doesn't mean that she was also feeling attracted to youPerhaps not but she obviously was.
Since sheRemember now, this was in a dream.
didn't press charges against you
I'll assume that she was (or that sheIn your opinion only.
was too embarrassed by the incident to talk about it).
>
Over the years, you've painted a picture of yourself as an old horndog
who'll jump in the sack with any woman who's willingThat's never actually been the case although I probably have had a lot
(your admission toIn certain times of my life, in certain circumstances.
frequently employing the services of $10 whores
shows just howIt's never been completely random but I probably have had more sexual
unselective you are in this regard.
I therefore think it a safe bet to say that if a girl you barely knewOkay, but it didn't happen that way.
came up to you, planted a kiss on you
and stuck her finger up your butt,Not the same.
you'd be totally into it.Not really up the butt, a closet equivalent would be my penis and yes, I
Most women tend to beOut of millions of women there are many different personalities.
a little more selective in choosing their sexualI can understand that, but it didn't happen that way this time.
partners,
and would consider having their crotch fingered, in public,Okay, I know the poem is lacking a lot of detail but we weren't being
a man they'd just met to be an act of sexual assault.I remember that episode, yes.
>
Remember the Seinfeld episode where Elaine was disgusted that the man
she had been on a first date with "took *it* out"? This man didn't even
touch her body -- he simply exposed his male member to her. And Elaine
was far from being a prude.
In order to hypothetically reverse the situation,It would be more accurate if it was a woman checking out my penis.
we need to considerIt would have dependent on my mood st the time. An attractive female
how you would have felt
if someone with the potential to physicallyPotential, perhaps, but the encounter was entirely friendly and
overpower you (a man),
had done the same thing to you.If she had said no, or stop, then I'd definitely have done so.
I know that you gender identify as heterosexual,That's true.
and that you viewThat's what you intend them as, obviously.
homosexual slurs as an assault on your manhood
but that's the point.Obviously.
want to know how you would feel if you were in a situation where theIt wasn't her butt I was investigating, to clarify.
sexual contact (butt-fingering)
was definitely *unwanted* by you.Probably the same as with almost anyone in that situation.
If, as you keep saying, this was the wild and crazy 80s,It was 1982, we barely even knew what AIDS was yet.
and you wereBasically this was correct, but more a cross section of early 1980s
with a group of wild and crazy punk rockers
-- many of whom were openlyI wasn't actually looking around at others, I was focused on my own
engaging in sexual intercourse
-- and that you're fingering he freckledI called her a girl in the poem but in 1982 she (and I) would be well in
girl
was just a bit of (relatively) innocent fun...That's exactly what it was, in that moment in May of 1982.
then this man'sNo, I have a penis so for me I'd probably have gotten a hand job or a
fingering you,
should be seen flirtatious fun as well.Personally, no.
Had that been the case, you would have said, "Sorry, man, I don't swingThe situation would never reach that level of intimacy.
that way," and moved on.
>
If, otoh, you would feel *violated* by his invasive finger,
then youMight feel, yes.
would begin to understand how a woman might feel
when she's on theIt wouldn't.
receiving end of such aggressive, physical "flirtation" from a man.
>
Your insistence that the question wouldn't apply
because you genderExactly, so why keep asking me?
identify as heterosexual
Would not want any manWhy would I want a man touching me there?
touching you there.
And, had a man simply stuck his hand down you pants after exchanging aAgain, I'm not gay, Pendragon.
few words of nondescript conversation,
you would feel like your body hadYou sure have a lot of homosexual sex on your mind this morning, Harry.
been violated.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.