Re: Ginsberg's Rorschach poetry

On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:27:34 +0000, Will Dockery wrote:
>

On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:22:57 +0000, HarryLime wrote:
>

On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 16:11:37 +0000, Will-Dockery wrote:
>

Victor H. wrote:
Will Dockery wrote:
>

Michael Pendragon wrote:
>
On Wednesday, June 1, 2022 at 9:27:52 AM UTC-4, Will Dockery wrote:
>
Allen Ginsberg's poem shows no pedophilia as far as I can tell.
>
What you claim to see in the poem seems to be from your own imagination,

Pendragon.

>
Says the
>
No, says several legitimate sources, which day that "Please

Master" was written by Allen Ginsberg for Neal Cassady, a grown man.

>
HTH and HAND.

>
Did Pendragon ever admit he was wrong....?

>
>
>
You know Pendragon never admits when he's wrong.

>
It doesn't matter if the poem was written for Neal Cassady (a man
roughly 1/3 Ginsberg's age),

>
You're wrong about Cassady's age.
>
See below.
>
as nothing in the actual poems specifies

this.
>
IIRC, the poem was a sexually explicit depiction of a homosexual Dom-Sub
BDSM session, presented in a strikingly crude manner, and is not
something I have any desire to reread.  I am not being prudish or
anything; I just don't find the topic interesting.
>
The "please, Master" exchanges between the Dom and Sub in the poem's
monologue, are (IMHO intentionally) reminiscent of an apprentice (a boy
aged 10-16) and a much older master craftsman in a given art or trade.
This recasts the narrative, at least on one level, as a depiction of
Man-Boy sex.
>
--

>
I haven't looked in a while but Neal Cassady was almost the same age as
Allen Ginsberg and Jack Kerouac.
>
You should fact check a little better, Harry.

>
I've no interest in Beat poets, and even less in who they fucked.
>
The implications of adult-child/master-apprentice sex in the poem remain
the same regardless of who inspired it.
>
--