Re: Harry Liar recycles an old Pedodragon lie

from
https://www.novabbs.com/arts/article-flat.php?id=255723&group=alt.arts.poetry.comments#255723
>
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 16:15:27 +0000, Michael Monkey Peabrain (MPP) aka
"HarryLime" wrote:

You not only supported both Ginsberg and Pickles, but
you mistakenly claimed that NAMBLA had done more to support LGBT rights
than any other organization.

>
No, Lying Michael. I told you that I agreed that gay sex for anyone
above the age of consent should be legal, pointed out that NAMBLA was
the only
group in Canada campaigning for that, and even called you a "homophobe"
when
you insisted that it should continue to be illegal.

>
I have your original statement on file, George, and can repost it if
necessary.
>

You later retracted that claim, but the
damage to your reputation had already been done.

>
No, Lying Michael. I still believe that gay sex between "children" above
the
age of consent should be legal, while you continue to lie and
misrepresent that claim.

>
No one ever said that sex, gay or straight, between two people above the
age of consent should not be legal, George.
>
This is yet another attempt at a straw man argument on your part -- not
to mention a pathetic attempt to turn the discussion away from what
you'd actually said.

>
No, it isn't, Lying Michael; but that means that we'll have to see what
I
"actually said."
>

Which means that I'm going to have to repost your *actual* statement in
context:
>
MMP: As previously noted (do try to get some reading comprehension
skills, old man), I have never made an issue of the participants' sex.
>
DUNCE: Another Pedodragon lie. You've ranted and raved for a month about
the group that's done the most to fight the above discrimination.
>
MMP: NAMBLA??? Are you seriously attempting to argue that NAMBLA is
spearheading the fight against sexual discrimination???
[END OF QUOTED PASSAGE]

I like how you snipped your last paragraph, where you answer your own
question:
<quote>
"*** That's right. George Dunce believes that NAMBLA is "the group
that's done the most to fight (sexual) discrimination." He also accused
me of being a "homophobe" and a "Nazi" for having attacked them." </q>
>
As noted, I called NAMBLA the group that did "the most to fighting the
above discrimination." There's no way to tell from your post what
discrimination I was talking about, since you posted that statement out
of context - at least twice - as an OP so no one could tell. Then you
made up a story (that I was talking about "sexual discrimination" in
general), which you've now changed (to claim I
was talking about "LGBT rights").
>
First you posted under the title of "DUNCE OUTED!!!" on December 7,
2017. I responded the same day, to tell you that was not what I was
talking about:
>
<quote>
On Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 7:53:01 AM UTC-5,
michaelmalef...@gmail.com wrote:
<sigh> Yet another Pedodragon lie. I called Pedodragon a fascist because
he wants to criminalize sex for people over the age of consent,
including gays: specifically, gays between the age of consent and the
unspecified higher age for anal sex he's advocating.
I did point out that NAMBLA's been fighting the legal battle against the
pedo's homophobic laws for decades, and here in Canada at least the
"pedophiles" (as he'd call them) on the Supreme Court have agreed with
them: those laws are unconstitutional. </q>
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.arts.poetry.comments/c/EnkIgYG-nwk/m/k-23aCsLAQAJ
>
I also responded to your Chimp's backup flaming on the same thread:
<q>
On Thursday, December 7, 2017 at 8:32:53 AM UTC-5, drive-by wrote:

NAMBLA fights age restrictions regarding young boys

>
Boys 16-21, in the case of the laws we were discussing.
>

under the guise of 'freedom of speech' to avoid crossing the line into a
cell..Pedophilia is alive and well, unfortunately, but NAMBLA is
basically defunct at this point.
Homophobia and Nazi originated from the lips of Pickering

>
"Nazi" was a Pendragon lie. I called him a fascist, because he wants to
throw even (some) adults into jail for having consensual sex.
And he's clearly a homophobe if he wants to throw males 17-21 into jail
just for having anal sex.
And he's a stupid homophobe if he really believes that throwing anyone
in jail is going to protect them from the risks of anal sex.
</q>
>
You responded by snipping what I told you. Then, you posted the same
deceptive post the next day, under the title of "GEORGE DANCE,
NAMBLA-MAN," where you claimed that by "fight[ing] the above
discrimination" I was talking about "human rights" in general.
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.arts.poetry.comments/c/V91D2MnuxtU/m/3t8tdrL-BgAJ
>
The only replies to that one were two sock puppets: one using my name,
and one using Zod's.
>
You may have actually posted that deceitful, out-of-context post more
than twice, but those were the only two I've tracked down.