Sujet : Re: Longest plan
De : jgd (at) *nospam* cix.co.uk (John Dallman)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.fandomDate : 22. Nov 2024, 22:10:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <memo.20241122211037.12904f@jgd.cix.co.uk>
References : 1
In article <
vhqfs2$195va$1@dont-email.me>,
petertrei@gmail.com(Cryptoengineer) wrote:
On 11/21/2024 4:00 AM, Charles Packer wrote:
Do you have a source for this rather bizarre provision?
https://www.npr.org/2023/03/30/1167042594/disney-desantis-board-reed
y-creek-charles
Key sentence:
"In this case, the declaration will continue "until twenty one (21)
years after the death of the last survivor of the descendants of
King Charles III."
The litigation on that could be highly amusing. A court would have
trouble interpreting it as anything shorter than 21 years after the death
of the last of Charles III's descendants who were living at the time the
contract was signed. Since he has several infant grandchildren, this
locks things up for about a century at minimum.
-- John Dallman"This isn't a supernova problem. It's a pointy-haired boss problem."