Re: Readercon code of conduct

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras fandom 
Sujet : Re: Readercon code of conduct
De : usenet (at) *nospam* mikevanpelt.com (Mike Van Pelt)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.fandom
Date : 04. Jun 2024, 18:47:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3njva$h3el$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <lbr238Fa73cU1@mid.individual.net>,
Bernard Peek  <bap@shrdlu.com> wrote:
The measures were probably excessive for a disease with a
mortality of 0.5% but would have been woefully inadequate if
it had been 2.5% instead. We took months to impose pretty
feeble restrictions. I would like to see response-times
measured in hours.

One of the big problems preventing early measures from being
taken was believing a word that came from the ChiCom regime.
The WHO basically parroted whatever they said about no
human-to-human transmission, etc., until it became impossible
to ignore.  The rest of the world needs to recognize that
totalitarian despots lie.

--
Mike Van Pelt       |  "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."
mvp at calweb.com   |   -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out Hurricane
KE6BVH              |      Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 May 24 * Readercon code of conduct41Gary McGath
22 May 24 +* Re: Readercon code of conduct39James Nicoll
24 May 24 i`* Re: Readercon code of conduct38D
24 May 24 i `* Re: Readercon code of conduct37Bernard Peek
25 May 24 i  `* Re: Readercon code of conduct36D
25 May 24 i   `* Re: Readercon code of conduct35Bernard Peek
26 May 24 i    +- Re: Readercon code of conduct1Dorothy J Heydt
26 May 24 i    `* Re: Readercon code of conduct33D
26 May 24 i     +* Re: Readercon code of conduct4Scott Dorsey
26 May 24 i     i`* Re: Readercon code of conduct3D
27 May 24 i     i `* Re: Readercon code of conduct2James Nicoll
27 May 24 i     i  `- Re: Readercon code of conduct1D
26 May 24 i     `* Re: Readercon code of conduct28WolfFan
27 May 24 i      `* Re: Readercon code of conduct27D
27 May 24 i       +* Re: Readercon code of conduct16Kerr-Mudd, John
27 May 24 i       i`* Re: Readercon code of conduct15Mike Van Pelt
28 May 24 i       i +* Re: Readercon code of conduct2D
29 May 24 i       i i`- Re: Readercon code of conduct1Mike Van Pelt
30 May 24 i       i `* Re: Readercon code of conduct12Bernard Peek
4 Jun 24 i       i  `* Re: Readercon code of conduct11Mike Van Pelt
5 Jun 24 i       i   +* Re: Readercon code of conduct9D
19 Jun 24 i       i   i`* Re: Readercon code of conduct8Cryptoengineer
20 Jun 24 i       i   i `* Re: Readercon code of conduct7D
20 Jun 24 i       i   i  `* Re: Readercon code of conduct6Cryptoengineer
20 Jun 24 i       i   i   `* Re: Readercon code of conduct5D
23 Jun 24 i       i   i    `* Re: Readercon code of conduct4Cryptoengineer
24 Jun 24 i       i   i     `* Re: Readercon code of conduct3D
24 Jun 24 i       i   i      `* Re: Readercon code of conduct2Cryptoengineer
24 Jun 24 i       i   i       `- Re: Readercon code of conduct1D
7 Jun 24 i       i   `- Re: Readercon code of conduct1Bernard Peek
28 May 24 i       `* Re: Readercon code of conduct10WolfFan
28 May 24 i        +* Re: Readercon code of conduct2D
30 May 24 i        i`- Re: Readercon code of conduct1WolfFan
29 May 24 i        `* Re: Readercon code of conduct7Mike Van Pelt
30 May 24 i         `* Re: Readercon code of conduct6Gary McGath
30 May 24 i          `* Re: Readercon code of conduct5Keith F. Lynch
31 May 24 i           `* Re: Readercon code of conduct4D
2 Jun 24 i            `* Re: Readercon code of conduct3Cryptoengineer
2 Jun 24 i             +- Re: Readercon code of conduct1D
3 Jun 24 i             `- Re: Readercon code of conduct1Gary McGath
24 May 24 `- Re: Readercon code of conduct1D

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal