Sujet : Re: Which Decade was the best for Doctor Who?
De : arthur (at) *nospam* alum.calberkeley.org (Arthur Lipscomb)
Groupes : rec.arts.drwho uk.media.tv.sf.drwho rec.arts.sf.tv rec.arts.sf.fandom rec.arts.tvDate : 10. Apr 2024, 07:37:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <uv58i7$p3a5$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 4/9/2024 7:28 AM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <R4B$5nDNzQFmFwrQ@jhall_nospamxx.co.uk>,
John Hall <john@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
In message <uv2742$3rf1o$1@dont-email.me>, Arthur Lipscomb
<arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> writes
On 4/7/2024 8:56 PM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <uuv74g$31q8c$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 4/7/2024 5:08 AM, The Doctor wrote:
1960s?
1970s?
1980s?
1990s?
2000s?
2010s?
2020s?
>
The only Doctor Who in the 1990s was the awful Americanised movie with
Paul McGann in 1996.
>
The original show ended in 1989 and the resurrected show started in 2005.
>
I did like the McCoy/McGann movie myself.
>
+1
>
I didn't like it myself. The worst thing was possibly its take on the
Master, who I have always felt should be outwardly charming rather than
hideous.
What about the Daleks exterminating the MAster?
--
>
I have to admit, the Daleks would never put someone on trial. They exterminate first and ask questions later! But it would have been a *little* more believable if the Master convinced the Daleks to let him git rid of the Doctor for them and it was all part of a joint plan. A throw away line could have fixed that plot hole. Perhaps that was the plan all along but the scene was cut for time.
Re: Which Decade was the best for Doctor Who?
Re: Which Decade was the best for Doctor Who?