Sujet : Re: Vancean logic
De : usenet (at) *nospam* mikevanpelt.com (Mike Van Pelt)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.fandomDate : 10. Aug 2024, 23:35:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v98pv1$udnk$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
a2f00df5-c717-499d-a9a0-13513ca03c68@sympatico.ca>,
Joel Polowin <
jpolowin@sympatico.ca> wrote:
"Let’s give votes to all children in this country, but let’s give
control over those votes to the parents of those children.
One of Heinlein's essays touched on this. I think the "extra
vote per child" was a part of the "only women vote" variation.
Other variations were "You get to vote if you can solve a
custom generated for you quadratic equation with integer roots",
"You get extra votes for certain quantifiable contributions
to the betterment of mankind."
I wonder if J.D. Vance has read Heinlein.
-- Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out HurricaneKE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston