Sujet : Re: Longest plan
De : tim (at) *nospam* smofs.org (Tim Illingworth)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.fandomDate : 25. Nov 2024, 16:43:26
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vi25uv$1ai7f$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/25/2024 9:35 AM, Michael Benveniste wrote:
On 11/24/2024 10:51 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
> IIRC, the clause actually specifies the 'descendants of King Charles
> the III at the time the contract is executed'.
>
> Barring illegitimate offspring, that's pretty objective.
Well, you've just listed one of the problem -- the grant is too vague.
Another is that the group has to be "easily identifiable." Good luck trying to do so.
It's somewhat common to name "the legitimate surviving issue" of
Joseph P. Kennedy.
Why a problem? The set consists of Charles, William, Harry, George, Charlotte, Louis, Archie and Lilibet. Should be easy enough to find when the last of them dies, and they have 21 years to notice it.
Mind you, none of the reports seem to include the actual language used, so picking for loopholes is kinda pointless.
Tim
Longest plan
Re: Longest plan
