Sujet : Re: Tonight's movie
De : tppm (at) *nospam* rr.ca.com (Tim Merrigan)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.fandomDate : 07. Feb 2025, 21:04:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vo5p1a$3l18q$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/5/2025 5:40 AM, Gary McGath wrote:
On 2/5/25 8:31 AM, Cryptoengineer wrote:
On 2/3/2025 11:14 AM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
Keith F. Lynch <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
We ended up mostly watching YouTube videos.
>
Most notably, a new Lehto's Law video that shocked even me. And I
thought I was unshockable. It's about a man who was compelled to
plead guilty to stealing his own identity. He had to falsely confess
that he wasn't who he claimed to be. (He was eventually exonerated.)
>
Lehto's Law is a channel that demonstrates something I hate about
YouTube.
>
It has interesting content, but the 'video' angle has exactly zero
added value - its just him sitting in his office talking at the
camera.
>
You spend 10-40 minutes for a story you could have read in 5 minutes.
>
No wonder I watch it at 1.5x to 1.75x speed, and still feel he's
wasting my time.
>
pt
I watched a Lehto's Law video with a friend yesterday, about the challenge to a Louisiana law that says cops can order people to stay 25 feet away from them. I'd already known a lot of what was in it. The main benefit was that I got my friend to see it.
I think videos are popular because many people use phones for computers, and it's a pain to read much text on them.
Have they never heard of audio only? If the video doesn't add anything, why have it?
-- Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.Tim Merrigan-- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.www.avg.com