Sujet : Re: A bottomless pit of plagiarism
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.fandom rec.arts.sf.moviesDate : 17. Jun 2025, 16:09:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <eo035kpqrrdg8sr2ljce0ik10d4q1qfm8s@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 13:46:07 -0700, Tim Merrigan <
tppm@rr.ca.com>
wrote:
On 6/16/2025 8:16 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
Note that most versions of Dracula end in England because they are
based (directly or indirectly through an earlier movie's script) on a
stage play, not the book. And I don't think these are isolated cases.
>
Also, the book is a collection of letters and diary entries, some
"originally" in shorthand. It would be hard to maintain that in a
visual format.
Another novel done similarly is, IIRC, Wilkie Collins' /The Woman in
White/. There were probably others: this is probably a recognized
literary style.
In the /Dracula/ I have seen, the closest to this is a scene where an
orderly reads a newspaper report about small childern injured by a
"bootiful lady". In the book, IIRC, you just get the newspaper story.
You /could/ do a film of the book with characters reading the various
letters, diaries, etc, but I agree that it would work very well. As
you say, this literary style would be hard to maintain in a visual
format.
-- "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,Who evil spoke of everyone but God,Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"