Sujet : Re: 25 Classic Books That Have Been Banned
De : usenet (at) *nospam* mikevanpelt.com (Mike Van Pelt)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written alt.usage.englishDate : 25. May 2025, 03:52:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <100u0ld$15sv8$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
100r948$bvlu$1@dont-email.me>,
Robert Carnegie <
rja.carnegie@gmail.com> wrote:
So some of the "top 100" seem to be (1) not
actually banned, or (2) not the most popular.
I still want to see a "Banned Book" list that is *books*
*that* *are* *actually* *banned*, as in not permitted to
be printed or sold.
This "A grammar school librarian determines that this book
inappropriate for a grammar school library", or even
"One parent complained about this book, and their complaint
was reviewed and filed appropriately" is a pretty weak sauce
definition of "banned".
-- Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out HurricaneKE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston