Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper
De : wthyde1953 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (William Hyde)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 23. Jun 2025, 20:09:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <103c8q1$1f0vg$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.21
The Horny Goat wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2025 16:50:56 -0000 (UTC), jdnicoll@panix.com (James
Nicoll) wrote:
 
That's not even getting into how Quebec would react as French gets
bumped down from second language to third, after Spanish.
 Which practically speaking is why the proposition is so absurd.
 BC and AB combined have a considerably larger population than Quebec
yet considerably fewer seats in Parliament
BC and AB together do have a larger population than Quebec.
But they have eighty seats in the House of Parliament, to Quebec's 78. This has been true since the redistribution of 2022.
About the senate you are entirely right. It is absurd that Quebec should have double the number of seats of the above two provinces.  But it is even more absurd that NB and NS each have ten senators to six for each
western province.
Why complain about Quebec when the real over representation is in the east?
But nobody should really give a damn about that institution.  Ontario is also underrepresented there, but we don't complain about it because is just doesn't matter.  In fact we offered to give six senate seats to Quebec to shut them up in some early 90s squabble.  Offer not accepted.
  AND the constitutional
amending formula prevents any constitutional amendments that Quebec or
the Maritime provinces object to no matter how lopsided the population
gets. Can't remember whether it was the premier of NS or NB who said
something to the effect of "the present amending formula works quite
well for us - why would we consent to change it?'
 Thus BC and AB are under represented in BOTH houses of Parliament and
the amending formula prevents any changes - forever.
On the contrary, seats in parliament can be redistributed by passing a simple bill.  The recent redistribution was a case of too little, too late.  It's already time to do it again.  Growing areas will always be underrepresented but riding populations in parts of the west are absurd - as they always have been in Ontario.
Because Quebec's (and PEI's) numbers can never go down, the house will have to bloat again to give the growing provinces fair representation.
Last time Harper shortchanged Ontario, costing him one conservative cabinet minister (and perhaps the only true fiscal conservative of his generation in the conservative party), this time that will have to be made up, resulting in a big increase in MPs.
  Is it any wonder
why people in BC and AB feel like second class citizens
Join the club.   My riding is, as of the 2021 census, now at the BC average. For most of my life it has been well above.  Aside from the six years I spent in Halifax I've always been underrepresented.
But now some riding numbers in BC and Alberta are looking insane.  One riding in AB seems to have 200,000 residents (not all electors, of course but I don't have contemporary elector numbers to hand).
At a guess, we have to add twenty people to parliament, to BC, AB, and Ont.
William Hyde

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Feb 25 * (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper70James Nicoll
25 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper65Charles Packer
19 Apr 25 i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper64Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
20 Apr 25 i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper59Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Scott Dorsey
20 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Lynn McGuire
20 Apr 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
21 Apr 25 i ii+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
21 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper9Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper8Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7Dimensional Traveler
28 May 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5William Hyde
28 May 25 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Cryptoengineer
28 May 25 i ii  i +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
24 Jun 25 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Cryptoengineer
24 Jun 25 i ii  i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
23 Jun 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
20 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper38Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper37Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper36James Nicoll
29 May 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper26Paul S Person
29 May 25 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper25Lynn McGuire
30 May 25 i ii  i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper21Dimensional Traveler
30 May 25 i ii  i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper18Scott Dorsey
30 May 25 i ii  i ii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i iii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Scott Dorsey
31 May 25 i ii  i iii `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i ii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper13Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii  i iii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
31 May 25 i ii  i iiii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii  i iiii `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
23 Jun 25 i ii  i iii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper9Paul S Person
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper8Cryptoengineer
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7Titus G
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Dimensional Traveler
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
25 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
25 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
3 Jun 25 i ii  i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Titus G
23 Jun 25 i ii  i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
23 Jun 25 i ii  i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
30 May 25 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i  +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
30 May 25 i ii  i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
23 Jun 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5Paul S Person
18 Jul22:09 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4William Hyde
20 Jul01:44 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Scott Dorsey
21 Jul21:19 i ii  i  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2William Hyde
22 Jul01:49 i ii  i   `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Scott Dorsey
23 Jun 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
18 Jul23:00 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2William Hyde
21 Jul21:24 i ii  i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
24 Jun 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
19 May 25 i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
19 May 25 i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
28 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2quadibloc
3 Mar 25 i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1WolfFan
28 Feb 25 +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Lynn McGuire
19 May 25 `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal