Sujet : Re: Books Banned in Utah.
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 13. Aug 2024, 16:37:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <76vmbjhcklcirsat3u6mrukmconei22niq@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On 8 Aug 2024 08:11:01 -0000,
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
Mike Van Pelt <usenet@mikevanpelt.com> wrote:
Do you want grammar school libraries to stock The Turner
Diaries, or other racist literature? I sure don't.
>
This is what librarians are for. They provide context to books.
I'm not sure what is meant by "provide context". I suggest that making
choices, providing clues to where a particular book might be, and
keeping order is closer to what librarians are for.
A well-curated, well-maintained, and easily navigated library is a
thing of beauty.
But what "context"? Posters? Pamphlets? Lecture series? Nattering at
patrons about the books they are checking out? Sounds pretty intrusive
to me.
And what /conceivable/ "context" could make, say, /Lady Chatterley's
Lover/ acceptable to 4th graders? Apart from putting it in the Adult
Section and keeping the kids confined to the Kiddie Section, of
course.
-- "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,Who evil spoke of everyone but God,Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"