Re: OT Politics Re: Three Body Problem

On Sun, 1 Sep 2024 19:21:01 -0400, William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com>
wrote:

The Horny Goat wrote:

On Mon, 26 Aug 2024 13:50:10 -0400, William Hyde
<wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:
 

Once I realized that in some states people can vote in the primary of
the other party (Nixon encouraged republicans to vote in democratic
primaries for McGovern), I lost all confidence in the primary system.
>
Mind you, our method of selecting potential members of parliament is
even worse.

 
How so? In Canada you actually have to join the party of your choice
in order to vote in what in the US would be a primary.

>
Or, for $10 and a bottle of cheap booze you can agree to become a paid
member of some party or other, go to a nomination meeting, vote as
requested, then go back to the street to enjoy your booze.
>
Or, you can be bused in by a German crook to vote for delegates who will
vote for his preferred bought and paid for party leader.
>
Or, you can be a foreign student drafted by officials of your country to
vote for the candidate of your choice in a nomination meeting, despite
not being a citizen.
>
Or, not being a citizen, you can run for MPP, be elected, and become a
cabinet member in a government dedicated to destroying the country.
>
All of this has been in the news.  Some recently.
>
Nobody should be allowed to vote in a nomination meeting who is not
>
(a) A citizen
>
(b) A paid member of the party for at least a year.
>
That wouldn't eliminate all the abuses but it is easily implemented and
would render the system less laughably corruptible.
>
But our major parties don't want it.  It would handicap their ability to
impose preferred candidates on us.

On those rare occasions when I think about this topic, for the last
several times, my preferred solution to the Primary Problem is:

1) Any Party that wants a Primary (preferential or one that actually
chooses the candidate) can have one by providing the relevant State
official:
a) a Ballot list containing the offices and candidates to be
voted on; and
b) a Party Member List containing the names and addresses of
all those to whom a ballot is to be mailed.
2) The State would pay for administering the Primary so that, under
the ancient principle "he who pays the piper calls the tune" the State
can control how it is done. [1]
3) An individual who is a member of more than one Party may receive
and may vote on a Primary from each of those parties.

This will eliminate using the Primaries as a recruiting scheme for new
members.

[1] Depending on the laws passed by the Legislature, this could
include ensuring that only registered voters are actually sent
ballots. Then again, those laws might require that the lists be used
as-is, since a Party can surely enroll a non-registered-voter if it
wishes to. States with two-tier registrations (State vs Federal) may
have special requirements here. Citizenship may also vary a bit,
depending on what the laws actually say. Other requirements (not being
a convicted felon, for example) may apply as well.

I am divided on the citizenship issue: one the one hand, it makes a
great deal of sense to exclude non-citizens; on the other hand, we
claim to have /universal/ suffrage. If we limit it to citizens, what
is to stop us from limiting it to Men? Or WASPs? Or landowners? And
some very local issues might not unreasonably include non-citizens who
live in the area affected.

But, for some reason, these thoughts only surface once every two years
or so.
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"