Re: Three Body Problem

On Tue, 20 Aug 2024, Scott Lurndal wrote:

D <nospam@example.net> writes:

 This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
 while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

>
Please don't use MIME on usenet.
>
>

On Sun, 18 Aug 2024, Lynn McGuire wrote:

>

"On Friday, Vice President Kamala Harris said she has a solution: a federal
ban on price gouging across the food industry."

>

Which also has /nothing/ to do with "freezing food prices and making
grocery stores report any changes in their prices".
>

You are incorrect. I was also commenting on Lynn, please stick to that.

>
I am correct. Please stick to the topic and stop trying to help Lynn
escape the consequences of his TPPT addiction.
>

>
No Paul, you are wrong here. Any common sense interpretation of that text
makes it obvious that Lynn is right and you are wrong.

>
Paul is correct.   A ban on price gouging is _not_ the same as
price controls.
>
One might even go so far as suggesting that the inability of the
federal government to enforce the anti-trust laws have increased
the frequency of price gouging.  Particularly in the grocery
industry which has overly consolidated over since 1980.
>

You are incorrect. Let's have a look at the definitions:
Price control:
"Restriction on maximum prices that is established and maintained by the government (as during periods of war or inflation)."
Price gouging:
"The act of or an instance of charging services or pricing goods at unreasonably high prices."
wordnik.com
If I, as a company, cannot set my prices freely, my price is controlled. Price control means that the government restrict the ability of business to control its price.