Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 20. Apr 2025, 17:07:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <d66a0klnjdbvngu1ktfi3uj1eocoeqoo7o@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:52:50 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:

Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> writes:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 08:43:08 -0700, The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca>
wrote:
>
On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 08:54:48 -0000 (UTC), Charles Packer
<mailbox@cpacker.org> wrote:
Sometimes empires just kind of fall apart over time--no catastrophe
required.
=20
https://reactormag.com/five-futures-where-the-us-ended-not-with-a-bang-
but-a-whimper/
>
Anybody planning to write a story about the splintering of North
America should note where the Canadian embassy is in Washington.
It was relocated to the foot of Capitol Hill in 1989.
>
In fairness Canada and the US have been "best buddies" pretty much
since 1815 - though no question our friend in the White House has
brought Canada-US relations to a 200 year low point in no more than
three months.
>
Buckle up! 45 months to go!
>
Or less, if congress does their constitutional duty, which
may not happen until after the midterms.

Actually, I think we need the /Republicans/ in Congress to do it.

With an assist from the Dems to convict in the Senate.

And language in the "to convict" proposition that also bars him from
public office, with no separate vote required. A separate vote would
allow the Republicans to convict but not bar.

Just to be sure no loopholes are left that might allow him to try
again on the grounds that he didn't get to serve the full four years.

This may seem unlikely, but it really is the only way to end the
madness. Of course, we would also have to avoid falling to the madness
of Bernie, his friends, and the various high-prestige schools that
think supporting terrorists (verbally) and chanting anti-Semitic
slogans (and, in some cases, taking physical action related to
anti-Semitism) is something they should encourage.

IOW, the only way out is for pretty much everyone to become sane
again. We can survive a few crazies on each side, locking them up when
they go beyond free speech to actually break laws. We can't lock up
half the country.

We need two Centrist parties, one slightly Right and one slightly
Left. One wonders if "Whigs" and "Tories" are available as Party
names.
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

Date Sujet#  Auteur
24 Feb 25 * (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper72James Nicoll
25 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper67Charles Packer
19 Apr 25 i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper66Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
20 Apr 25 i i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
20 Apr 25 i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper61Paul S Person
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Scott Dorsey
20 Apr 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Lynn McGuire
20 Apr 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
20 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
21 Apr 25 i ii+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
21 Apr 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper9Paul S Person
19 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper8Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7Dimensional Traveler
28 May 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5William Hyde
28 May 25 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Cryptoengineer
28 May 25 i ii  i +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
24 Jun 25 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Cryptoengineer
24 Jun 25 i ii  i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
23 Jun 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
19 May 25 i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
20 May 25 i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
19 May 25 i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper40Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper39Paul S Person
28 May 25 i ii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper38James Nicoll
29 May 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper26Paul S Person
29 May 25 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper25Lynn McGuire
30 May 25 i ii  i +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper21Dimensional Traveler
30 May 25 i ii  i i+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper18Scott Dorsey
30 May 25 i ii  i ii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i iii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Scott Dorsey
31 May 25 i ii  i iii `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i ii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper13Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii  i iii+* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
31 May 25 i ii  i iiii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Bobbie Sellers
31 May 25 i ii  i iiii `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Dimensional Traveler
23 Jun 25 i ii  i iii`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper9Paul S Person
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper8Cryptoengineer
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7Titus G
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4Dimensional Traveler
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Cryptoengineer
25 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Paul S Person
25 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
24 Jun 25 i ii  i iii   `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Robert Woodward
3 Jun 25 i ii  i ii`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Titus G
23 Jun 25 i ii  i i+- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
23 Jun 25 i ii  i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
30 May 25 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3Paul S Person
30 May 25 i ii  i  +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1James Nicoll
30 May 25 i ii  i  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
23 Jun 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper7Paul S Person
18 Jul22:09 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper6William Hyde
20 Jul01:44 i ii  i `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper5Scott Dorsey
21 Jul21:19 i ii  i  `* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper4William Hyde
22 Jul01:49 i ii  i   +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2Scott Dorsey
22 Jul19:39 i ii  i   i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Christian Weisgerber
23 Jul00:05 i ii  i   `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Lynn McGuire
23 Jun 25 i ii  +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper3William Hyde
18 Jul23:00 i ii  i`* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2William Hyde
21 Jul21:24 i ii  i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
24 Jun 25 i ii  `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers
19 May 25 i i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1William Hyde
19 May 25 i `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Paul S Person
28 Feb 25 +* Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper2quadibloc
3 Mar 25 i`- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1WolfFan
28 Feb 25 +- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Lynn McGuire
19 May 25 `- Re: (ReacTor) Five Futures Where the US Ended Not With a Bang But a Whimper1Bobbie Sellers

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal