Sujet : Re: Frankenstein
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 04. Jul 2024, 17:02:38
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <g6hd8jdv4kst5qjfvqu5neupbbopa11tu4@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 18:00:30 -0000 (UTC), Don <
g@crcomp.net> wrote:
<snippo RC attempt to defend Queen Victoria and so their hatred and
contempt for anything that has happened since>
<you lost, guys (and I /mean/ "guys"), get over it>
All I remember of /Frankenstein/ -the-book was how hard it was to get
through. And so a pain to read.
The films, BTW, appear to be based on a stage play, or on earlier
films, and not the book directly. There may have been an exception or
two, but, if they copy the book, they are long, boring, and praised
only by high-level intellectuals.
Unlike, say, Stoker's /Dracula/, which was written by someone who at
least knew how to do it.
-- "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,Who evil spoke of everyone but God,Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"