Sujet : Re: the future long term financial apocalypse of the USA
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 22. May 2024, 17:10:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <hn5s4jpnfj0c23hpb1kkrpu8dq04a95jrr@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On 21 May 2024 19:09:25 -0000,
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
On Tue, 21 May 2024, Scott Dorsey wrote:
>
D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
I am okay paying my share of taxes, as long as everyone else is paying their
share too, and I used to think most people are like that. It's definitely
different from place to place.
>
If you think taxes go towards a good thing, why would it change your
position if others pay or don't pay? Your money still does good.
>
Because I am human, and humans get resentful when they feel like they are
being treated unfairly. (Lazarus Long had something to say about this.)
>
So you are saying that the only reason you like paying taxes is if all
other people around you are forced to do so as well.
>
No, that is not what I am saying. You are asserting the contrapositive.
Given
(everyone else is paying their share) => (I am okay paying my share)
the contrapositive would be
(I am /not/ okay paying my share) => (everyone else is /not/ paying
their share)
provided I recall my logic correctly.
He appears to be asserting that you are saying:
(all other people around you are forced [to pay taxes)) => (you like
paying taxes)
which is a distortion of what you are saying.
He, OTOH, appears to be working with the proposition
(I only pay taxes because I am forced to do so) => (everyone who pays
taxes is forced to do so)
at least as far as I can tell.
This is not a person who has any significant connection to reality.
-- "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,Who evil spoke of everyone but God,Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"