Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Defining Our Terms: What Do We Mean by "Hard SF"?
De : jbeeson (at) *nospam* invalid.net.invalid (Joy Beeson)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 20. Aug 2024, 01:54:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <i4q7cj9jhb70f9gb5crqgcbjqk88cqimid@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Forte Agent 3.2/32.830
On Mon, 5 Aug 2024 16:09:31 -0000 (UTC),
jdnicoll@panix.com (James
Nicoll) wrote:
Defining Our Terms: What Do We Mean by "Hard SF"?
Hard SF has never been a unified subgenre. Here are five overlapping
varieties of story to which the label applies...
https://reactormag.com/defining-our-terms-what-do-we-mean-by-hard-sf/
One of the commenters mentioned that he never got the hang of
calculus.
I got first-semester calculus fine, and I got second-semester calculus
fine (both faded away during the intervening six decades), but
calculus itself I never got.
Many years later, I learned that this was because my teachers not only
didn't explain the fundamental thereom to me, they didn't even tell me
that calculus *had* a fundamental thereom.
-- Joy Beesonjoy beeson at centurylink dot nethttp://wlweather.net/PAGEJOY/