Re: Could there be a Gnarly Man in current times?

In article <slrnv3l8ah.sbt.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>,
Christian Weisgerber  <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:

On 2024-05-07, Tony Nance <tnusenet17@gmail.com> wrote:
>

This story was written in 1939 and is set in 1956. It’s about an
immortal Neanderthal - basically he stopped aging around the age of 33.
He most definitely looks the part,

>
So with modern clothing and grooming he'll blend right in.
I'm sorry, were you under the impression--as a writer in 1939 might
have been--that a Neanderthal would noticeably stand out?
>

and he’s intelligent, articulate,
knowledgable, knows dozens of languages, etc etc etc,

>
That we don't know.  The language ability of Neanderthals has
attracted plenty of attention, but the anatomical details mostly
hinge on soft tissue that doesn't fossilize, never mind that we
don't know their cognitive abilities.  I guess the recent trend is
to _assume_ by default that they were very much like H. sapiens,
but we don't know.
>

And this made me wonder:
Given his obvious physical differences,

>
Bzzt.  _If_ he can articulate and cognitively handle H. sapiens
languages, he'll pass.
>

and with modern technology and
communication being what it is, are there ways he could he stay a member
of modern society and also avoid attention?

>
Maintaining fake identities is becoming ever more difficult, I
think.
>

Well, if you have someone of impeccable character like Doc Savage
to vouch for you, and a skilled lawyer like Ham Brooks to do your
paperwork (while carefully seeming not too chummy..), there's no
limit to how far you could go.
--
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..