Re: Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes

In article <86v86jl3g0k760hmv3ak1gc4ij54iea90f@4ax.com>,
Paul S Person  <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

On Fri, 07 Jun 2024 16:29:29 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
wrote:
>

Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> writes:

On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:29:15 +0100, Robert Carnegie

>

>
I don't think I ever said it was a big film. It was a film about a
young man who leaves his small town for the big city and eventually
saves the town from dying of thirst. It has some action, but the story
is, how should I say this?, rather ordinary.=20
>
When the second reboot Bond film (/Qantum of Solace/) come out, it was
roundly ridiculed for treater water as a vital resource.

>
Cite?

>
After all these years? Probably Ebert. I was a big fan of Ebert.
Maltin ducks the issue by saying "prized natural resource" without
revealing what the resource is.

IIRC, they were kind of stuck with a script that needed another pass
because of a writers' strike.
--
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..