Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 21. Oct 2024, 17:01:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <t7uchj1t13d1t91nq47qungl7tmpmpr6lo@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 16:42:08 -0000 (UTC), Don <g@crcomp.net> wrote:

Scott Dorsey wrote:
Robert Carnegie wrote:
Bobbie Sellers wrote:
Don wrote:
Agatha Christie restored Poe's idealized detective. Her character,
Hercule Poirot, also brings back the Francophilia found in Poe's Dupin.
>
 ????????Pardon me but Poirot is a Belgian. Nothing to do with Some
imagained Francophilia.
>
Also, he has aeveral unlikeable qualities.
Such as obsession with grooming his moustache.
>
I found this amusing as a kid, because in Hawaii where I lived at the time,
grooming your moustache is a signal that you wish to purchase marijuana.
>
A female medical director recently told me about another Hawaiian
flavored signal: the upside down pineapple. You see it on keychain
fobs or on the back windows of cars and trucks. It denotes a swinger.
>
Bobby Sellers, how do you imagine Poirot's being Belgian precludes his
(and Christie's own) Francophilia? Or perhaps, as you see it, their
Francophilia is also imaginary? (In the latter case we'll agree to
disagree.)

Apart from his correcting anyone who calls him "French" to say
"Belgian"?

A true Francophile would be proud to be mistaken for a Frenchman.
Poirot is annoyed.
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Sep 24 * It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF39Robert Woodward
22 Sep 24 +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF35Ahasuerus
7 Oct 24 i`* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF34Don
10 Oct 24 i `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF33Kevrob
11 Oct 24 i  +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF5Scott Dorsey
11 Oct 24 i  i+* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
11 Oct 24 i  ii`- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Scott Dorsey
12 Oct 24 i  i`* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2James Nicoll
12 Oct 24 i  i `- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Scott Dorsey
11 Oct 24 i  `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF27Don
11 Oct 24 i   `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF26Bobbie Sellers
12 Oct 24 i    +- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Paul S Person
17 Oct 24 i    +- CRITICAL by Robin Cook1Don
20 Oct 24 i    `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF23Robert Carnegie
20 Oct 24 i     +- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Bobbie Sellers
20 Oct 24 i     `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF21Scott Dorsey
20 Oct 24 i      `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF20Don
20 Oct 24 i       +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF9William Hyde
21 Oct 24 i       i`* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF8Robert Woodward
21 Oct 24 i       i +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF6Don
21 Oct 24 i       i i`* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF5Paul S Person
22 Oct 24 i       i i +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2Lynn McGuire
23 Oct 24 i       i i i`- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Don
23 Oct 24 i       i i `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2Cryptoengineer
23 Oct 24 i       i i  `- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Dimensional Traveler
21 Oct 24 i       i `- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Paul S Person
20 Oct 24 i       +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF8Bobbie Sellers
21 Oct 24 i       i`* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF7Don
21 Oct 24 i       i +* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2Bobbie Sellers
21 Oct 24 i       i i`- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Don
22 Oct 24 i       i `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF4Scott Dorsey
22 Oct 24 i       i  +- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Don
22 Oct 24 i       i  `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2Don
22 Oct 24 i       i   `- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1Paul S Person
21 Oct 24 i       `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2Paul S Person
21 Oct 24 i        `- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1William Hyde
12 Oct 24 `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF3Robert Carnegie
12 Oct 24  `* Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF2Paul S Person
12 Oct 24   `- Re: It is not just Physics that Should be Hard in Hard SF1William Hyde

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal