Re: Climate models are wrong.

On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 19:46:23 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

Dear rasw:ers,
>
This is important news...
>
https://youtu.be/Xa665wL7Tcg
>
current globalist financed climate models are wrong and we do in fact not
have a problem with the climate. It is natural changes all the way.
>
Enjoy the video!

Don't bet your house on it

It's the Heartland Institute
They took cigarette company money to say cigarette smoke wasn't
dangerous

John Christy is way out on his own about his claims of warming and
he's got no actual history in climate modelling
He's ideologically driven because he thinks the developing world needs
access to fossil fuels to get out of poverty
“There’s no question that carbon-based energy has made for longer,
better lives,You know, I lived in Africa for a while and without
energy, life is brutal and short. And I wish these environmentalists
would go live in a country like that for a while and understand that,
understand why they are going full bore on energy production.”

Roy Spenser, his co-worker on the satellite temperatur measuring  is
an intelligent design pusher and here's a response to his presentation
at God Is Great. Is God Green? A Conference on Evangelicals and the
Environmental Task.” in 2008
" I wouldn’t feel comfortable saying, as Dr. Spencer did in the paper
that was presented, that God’s likely to have made the climate system
insensitive to human  emissions of greenhouse gases."
So that's where they're coming from "God won't let it happen"


There's been geniune problems found in their research
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/02112020/john-christy-alabama-climate-contrarian/#:~:text=Spencer%20shared%20Christy%27s%20religious%20orientation,was%20creating%20an%20upheaval%20in

"Over time, studies uncovered layer upon layer of flaws in Christy’s
analysis, with his old dissertation advisor, Trenberth, chief among
his early critics.

Trenberth and others showed that space-based temperature reading—far
from being a precision science—involved applying complex mathematical
formulas to adjust for the vagaries of satellites themselves.
Satellites drift east and west, their orbits decay, they retire
altogether, with new satellites taking their place. Each anomaly could
skew the temperature readings in a different way.

In 1997, Trenberth and a colleague at the National Center for
Atmospheric Research showed that abrupt “downward jumps” in Christy
and Spencer’s temperature readings coincided with changes from old
satellites to new satellites, accounting for their “cooling” finding.
Climate scientist Andrew Dessler of Texas A&M has explained it this
way: “Suppose you are trying to watch your weight, but your scale
breaks and a month passes before you buy a new one,” he said. “If the
new scale says you are two pounds heavier than your last reading on
the old scale, does this mean you have gained two pounds? Or does the
new scale just read two pounds heavier than the old one?” 

A team from the California research firm Remote Sensing Systems (RSS)
showed in 1998 that satellites lose altitude over time, at a rate that
varies year-to-year, depending on solar activity. Christy and Spencer,
the RSS team showed, failed to account for how their angle of
observation changed with this orbital decay. "

"RSS would soon begin putting together its own satellite temperature
data set, obtaining consistently different results from those of
Christy and Spencer.

In 2004, scientists at the University of Washington published evidence
that Christy and Spencer’s readings of what was purported to be the
lower atmosphere—the troposphere—were being polluted by the cooler
upper atmosphere, the stratosphere. The following year, the same team
in Washington showed that Christy and Spencer’s temperature plots were
biased by the satellites’ east-west drift.

Christy and Spencer responded to the critiques by adjusting their
calculations, and by 1998, they had backed off their cooling finding,
reporting a global warming trend apparent in their data, albeit a
slight one."

“The history of the UAH tropospheric temperature data sets is a
history of serious scientific error,” said Benjamin Santer, a climate
researcher at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory,  referring to
the University of Alabama in Huntsville. “Most of the serious errors
in UAH temperature data have been detected by other research groups,
not by UAH scientists.”

ExxonMobil George W. Bush to appoint him to review IPCC submissions
because he suited their desires to keep selling fossil fuels

Here's quotes showing either his dishonesty or his stupidity about
power sources

“I try to tell people about why there’s just not enough energy there,
I can stand in the sunlight. It doesn’t bother me at all. If the wind
is blowing, doesn’t bother me at all. That tells you right there, it
has very little energy.

“But if I stood inside the boiler of a natural gas or coal fired power
plant, I’d be incinerated. That’s where the energy is.”