Sujet : Re: Cover art mixup
De : jdnicoll (at) *nospam* panix.com (James Nicoll)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 23. Jun 2024, 13:55:28
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Public Access Networks Corp.
Message-ID : <v59600$5sr$1@reader1.panix.com>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
robertaw-7448D9.21544222062024@news.individual.net>,
Robert Woodward <
robertaw@drizzle.com> wrote:
In article <YIEdO.9438$zMs3.1124@fx48.iad>,
Lee Gleason <lee.gleason@comcast.net> wrote:
>
It the late 70s, early 80s, there was an SF paperback published that
mistakenly used the cover art intended for a different novel from the
same publisher. Does anyone recall the name of the book? It was pretty
widely discussed at the time.
>
Publishers have used inappropriate cover art that they had on hand for
decades. It is possible that you are referring to the first edition of
Lawrence Watt-Evans's _The Unwilling Warlord_ (1989) that used Darrell
Sweet art that was originally done for a Lloyd Arthur Eshbach title
(IIRC, _The Scroll of Lucifer_, released in 1990). This is later than
you specified.
I wonder if Lee is not referring to a famous story about Jack Vance
complaining about his book cover. This inspired, iirc, an artist to
take special care with the cover he was working on for a non-Vance
book. The result was so good the published decided it was perfect
to replace the cover Jack Vance was bitching about.
I think the Vance was Araminta Station.
-- My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll