Re: Highlights and Lowlights - August 2024

On 06/09/2024 16.29, Tony Nance wrote:

On 9/5/24 11:25 PM, Titus G wrote:

January 2014.
The Stainless Steel Rat    Harry Harrison        e 3
Futuristic super criminal. A bit over the top. Enjoyable pot boiler.
March 2014
The Stainless Steel Rat's Revenge Harry Harrison Not Finished.
A bit over the top. Too similar to its predecessor.
>
When I first read these last century from the library, I just loved
them. Are they a first reading for you?

 They are, and I am greatly enjoying this one.
 When I started reading this newsgroup in the mid-1990s, it didn't take long for me to realize I had a pretty non-standard introduction to SF - at least non-standard compared to almost everyone on the group at the time. As two examples (of many), I've never read a Heinlein juvie, nor a Norton, and when I tried to catch up in my 30s, they simply did not work for me. At all.

Andre Norton is the first author that I ever sought out by name, at
the age of about eight. Unfortunately, I now find her work nearly
unreadable -- certainly a slog. So, I completely sympathize with
you there.
However, I'm surprised that the Heinlein juvies were problematic
for you. In my experience, they work just as well in my second
childhood as they did in my first. RAH didn't write down to his
audience.
I just had a thought: was it the "father figure states the moral
of the story to the protagonist"?
--
Michael F. Stemper
I feel more like I do now than I did when I came in.