Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear

On 9/19/2024 5:03 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:

On 9/19/2024 2:47 PM, quadibloc wrote:

On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 0:08:18 +0000, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>

Chemical saturation limits EVERYTHING but is rarely taken into account.

>
Given that the proportion of carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere is measured in parts per million, I had
not thought of that as an important factor just yet.
>
If the carbon dioxide level got high enough that it
was an issue... long before that point was reached,
global warming would no longer be the most important
consequence of the CO2 concentration. Instead, the
toxicity of CO2 would have led to the extinction of
human life.
>
John Savard

 There have been extensive studies on the level of CO2 toxicity.
 Some people get a headache at 0.5% (5,000 ppm).  Many people get a headache at 1.0% (10,000 ppm).  People start dying at 15% (150,000 ppm).
 The Apollo 13 astronauts were subjected to high CO2 levels, very close to 15% before the ground crew figured out how to reduce the CO2 content in the much warmer capsule as the LEM was under -100 F or so.
 It is a fact that the Earth has experienced much higher levels of CO2 in the far distant past, up to 8,000 ppm.
 If CO2 toxicity was a serious problem, then hydrocarbon (coal, fuel oil natural gas) power plant workers would be continuously sick as the stacks emit 10% to 20% CO2 depending on load of the device.

Which is part of why they have the stacks in the first place; to
get those gases away from the plant.
Try sitting at the top of the chimney, with your head in the flow,
and tell us how it makes you feel.
pt