Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ras written |
Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote:But those same batteries have to power the AC which in LA means a lot of "out of juice" EVs on the highway to add to the "stop" part of "stop and go traffic"! :P
<about LA smog>Having lived there, I can confirm that it is far better thanAnd this is in great part due to government regulation of auto manufacturers,
the 70s and 80s. I recall playing softball one saturday
in 1985 and having to stop between home and first to catch
my breath.
first in California but then across the US. Car manufacturers fought the
emission control requirements tooth and nail, and most of the early attempts
they made to meet them were incredibly poor and reduced both performance and
reliability. Eventually they were driven toward closed-loop fuel injection
control and then the world changed for the better in so many different ways.
Eventually the emission control requirements wound up resulting in a better
technology with higher performance and better reliability as well as a lot
less smog.
On the other hand, it's worse now that it was a decadeElectric vehicles still pollute, it's just that the pollution is done at the
ago, simply due to population growth over the last
couple decades (and wildfires).
power plant many miles away where it isn't visible. BUT, electric vehicles
only use pollution-causing power when they are running, not when they are
immobilized in traffic on the 101. Cars in LA seem to spend as much time
stopped as moving, and so electric power is likely to be a win.
--scott
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.