Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ras written |
In article <vitflv$1tu05$1@dont-email.me>,You're talking to someone who spent tens of thousands of lines debating Ted. You could never shake Ted from his core beliefs, but if you beat him over the head often enough he sometimes, sometimes, would actually learn something.
William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:D wrote:You do understand you're dealing with a politer Terry Austin, right? Or>>
>
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024, William Hyde wrote:
>D wrote:>>>
>
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:>On 12/3/2024 7:59 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:>On 12/3/24 17:01, Lynn McGuire wrote:???Climate Change over the past 4000 Years???I have quite a bit of experience running forced flow and natural flow>
reactors. Sol acts exactly like a natural flow reactor with both
short
and long cycles of variability.
You have zero climate science background, so your experience with
non-nuclear reactors seems somewhat irrelevent.
Nonsense. Climate "science" is political. The real stuff is climate
science reduced to physics.
Let's try a little test, shall we?
>
What do you think is used to create climate models?
>
No cheating, no looking it up. I want to know what you thought at the
time you wrote the above.
>
William Hyde
That models can be whipped up at will, based on the directions of the
people who are funding it. Climate gate is an excellent example of the
corruption in the field. It was probably just the tip of the iceberg.
That is not an answer to the question I asked.
>
Try again.
>
perhaps Ted Holden.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.