Re: stats 2024

On 1/2/2025 11:47 AM, Paul S Person wrote:

On Wed, 1 Jan 2025 23:35:25 +0100, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
 

>
>
On Wed, 1 Jan 2025, The Doctor wrote:
>

In article <16300969-07a7-5c8c-ed5f-23d38586a1e4@example.net>,
D  <nospam@example.net> wrote:

>
>
On Wed, 1 Jan 2025, The Doctor wrote:
>

Group : rec.arts.sf.written
Statistics : from 1/1/2024 to 12/31/2024
>
***** Users with most messages *****
num| Name                        | Nb Msg | size       | or. | %
>

----|-----------------------------|--------|------------|-----|------------------|

1 |                             |  6,002 | 16,422,887 | 705 | 66.42%
xxxxxxxxxx
2 | Lynn McGuire                |    341 |    928,572 |  98 |  3.77%
3 | Paul S Person               |    315 |  1,114,057 |   0 |  3.49%
4 | D                           |    247 |    852,999 |   3 |  2.73%

>
Congratulations on the victory Lynn! Paul, you put up a good fight. Well
deserved second place!

>
Who the blank is blank?
>

>
This is a very good question! Until he announces himself, I will continue
to have Lynn as the winner. Lynn better hope he does not announce himself,
since he would then be bumped down to second place. =/

 I found and retrieved the original post. I just deleted the filter
that prevented it from being downloaded. I really should trim those
some day ...
 Bice has pointed out that his message count for the year has been
reduced from 12 to 1. So perhaps this is actually a for 1_2_/1/24
through 12/31/24.
 Then again, perhaps not:
 ***** Days with most messages *****
  num| date       | Nb Msg | size    | or. | %
----|------------|--------|---------|-----|------------------|
   1 | 11/11/2024 |     72 | 189,461 |   5 |  0.80% xxxxxxxxxx
   2 | 9/21/2024  |     63 | 206,149 |   4 |  0.70% xxxxxxxx
   3 | 8/22/2024  |     62 | 245,560 |   2 |  0.69% xxxxxxxx
   4 | 2/14/2024  |     61 | 167,820 |   2 |  0.68% xxxxxxxx
 certainly looks like it covers the entire year here.
 I found this interesting bit:
 ***** Users with highest total size of messages *****
  num| Name                        | size       | Nb Msg | or. | %
----|-----------------------------|------------|--------|-----|------------------|
   1 |                             | 16,422,887 |  6,002 | 705 | 64.93%
xxxxxxxxxx
   2 | Paul S Person               |  1,114,057 |    315 |   0 |  4.40%
   3 | Lynn McGuire                |    928,572 |    341 |  98 |  3.67%
   4 | D                           |    852,999 |    247 |   3 |  3.37%
 Huh. Perhaps I need to do more snipping ...
 Is the first line, perhaps, a total line? With the "xxxxxxxxxx"
intended to show where the actual list begins?

That is certainly my take on it. It seemed obvious.
pt