Liste des Groupes | Revenir à ras written |
William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> writes:As I recall there were far more mutual firms about thirty years ago. Many demutualized, with the policy holders getting shares in the new company. It was similar to the case of S&Ls a decade or so earlier but at least in the case of my family's insurer, Canada Life, it was handled well.Dimensional Traveler wrote:There are mutual insurers (such as state farm) where theOn 1/11/2025 8:54 AM, Paul S Person wrote:>On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 14:48:19 -0800, Bobbie Sellers
<bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>>Â Â Â Â So Southern California should be abandoned by all but the>
entertainment industry and the retirees should move to Florida.:^(
Florida is out -- retirees are fleeing because of the high condo fees,
or some such nonsense.
>
Well, according to /some/ online sources, anyway.
High insurance costs for all the beachfront buildings that are starting
to subside because of rising sea levels and the resulting knock-on
effects from that like insurance companies refusing to add new policies
or renew existing ones because doing so would endanger their profits.
People in the reinsurance industry started paying attention to the
problem of climate change a long time ago. At about the turn of the
century two big ones, Munich Re and Swiss Re, decided to stop offering
coverage on the US gulf coast. Others simply put up prices. As
insurance companies rely on re-insurers to take some of the risk
companies had to raise rates to preserve profits.
>
I'd be surprised if something similar hasn't happened in fire-prone
areas. Insurance companies are not in the business of saving people,
they are in the business of spreading risk and making pots of money in
the process.
risk is spread over the pool of insured with premiums adjusted
appropriately. Excess premium dollars would be returned to the
insured annually. Although State Farm hasn't been able to return
anything for a decade or more IME.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.