Re: Babel

On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 07:47:35 -0400, Cryptoengineer
<petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:

On 3/25/2024 11:29 PM, Evelyn C. Leeper wrote:

On 3/25/24 2:18 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote:

Mad Hamish  <newsunspammelaws@iinet.unspamme.net.au> wrote:

On 5 Mar 2024 01:35:28 -0000, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:
>

So, I am reading Rebecca Kuang's _Babel_ to see just what it was
that the
Hugo Committee may have objected to, and I find it extremely
pro-Chinese.
It is strongly against British imperialism and against the Opium
War, and
the Chinese government of the time may not have been very strong but
was
determined.

>
I think I've heard that the issue isn't the current work but that
she's written stuff critical of China in the past.

>
Which would be even WORSE because it would be punishing her for
"reforming"
and finally writing something less critical.
>
Whatever it was, it was sure a mess.
--scott

 
As I noted elsewhere, the good news is that all this resulted in a lot
of publicity for the book, which could well reach a wider audience than
if it *had* won the Hugo.

>
Regardless of nigglined edge cases, the point remains. Russia has
been invaded many times in history, while the US mainland has not.
>
pt

Depends how far back you go in history.  How about the first half of
the last half millennium.
--

Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.

Tim Merrigan

--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com