Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them
De : kludge (at) *nospam* panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 19. Apr 2024, 22:13:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Message-ID : <uvumpj$dav$1@panix2.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3
Robert Woodward  <robertaw@drizzle.com> wrote:
In article <slrnv252ci.17f0.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>,
Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:
>
On 2024-04-15, James Nicoll <jdnicoll@panix.com> wrote:
 
"Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them
Inexplicably not titled "Why I Own Most of Hal Clement's Novels."
>
https://reactormag.com/bad-books-and-the-readers-that-love-them/
 
| Sometimes readers simply want ripping adventure stories inspired by
| the unusual behavior of water at 374 C under a pressure of 218
| atmospheres.[3]
 
_Close to Critical_, I guess?  It's been too long, I don't recall
anything about it.
 
"Unusual", of course, is betraying your biased viewpoint.  Everybody
knows that water is... a rock.
>
Ahem, a gas - see _Ice World_.

Water is a liquid except under very unusual circumstances.  I know there are
places like "Buffalo" and "Michigan" where water can be seen in solid form
but this is not normal and not to be encountered under conditions capable of
supporting human life.  Also it is ruins perfectly good whisky.  Beware at
all times of solid water.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Apr 24 * [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them15James Nicoll
15 Apr 24 +- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1Cryptoengineer
16 Apr 24 +- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1Lynn McGuire
17 Apr 24 +* Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them2John Savard
17 Apr 24 i`- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1John Savard
19 Apr 24 +* Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them8Christian Weisgerber
19 Apr 24 i`* Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them7Robert Woodward
19 Apr 24 i `* Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them6Scott Dorsey
20 Apr 24 i  +- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1John Savard
30 Apr 24 i  `* Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them4Michael F. Stemper
30 Apr 24 i   +* Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them2Lynn McGuire
2 May 24 i   i`- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1James Nicoll
30 Apr 24 i   `- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1William Hyde
15 May 24 +- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1Joy Beeson
22 May 24 `- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1Default User

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal