Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them
De : quadibloc (at) *nospam* servername.invalid (John Savard)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 20. Apr 2024, 15:50:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <a3l72j930phh7fu4niaur3bjr48240dseq@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
On 19 Apr 2024 21:13:23 -0000, kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

I know there are
places like "Buffalo" and "Michigan" where water can be seen in solid form
but this is not normal and not to be encountered under conditions capable of
supporting human life.

Our expedition to the planet Earth has shown that humans are more
capable of adaptation to extreme environments than you give them
credit for. For example, we have observed a place called "Canada".

As another example, the political unit which contains both "Michigan"
and "New York" (in which "Buffalo" is contained) also includes an area
known as "Alaska", which does have numerous human occupants. However,
it is possible that extreme cold has deleterious effects on human
intelligence; we have noted the individual human "Sarah Paliln" who
hails from "Alaska".

They also have a competition called the "Iditarod" which some have
taken to jocularly naming the "Idiot Rod", so this may indicate some
correlation between the effects of extreme cold and risk-taking
behavior, although that is far from being necessarily true;
exaggeration to avail oneself of an opportunity for humor is known
even among our race.

John Savard

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Apr 24 * [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them15James Nicoll
15 Apr 24 +- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1Cryptoengineer
16 Apr 24 +- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1Lynn McGuire
17 Apr 24 +* Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them2John Savard
17 Apr 24 i`- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1John Savard
19 Apr 24 +* Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them8Christian Weisgerber
19 Apr 24 i`* Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them7Robert Woodward
19 Apr 24 i `* Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them6Scott Dorsey
20 Apr 24 i  +- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1John Savard
30 Apr 24 i  `* Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them4Michael F. Stemper
30 Apr 24 i   +* Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them2Lynn McGuire
2 May 24 i   i`- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1James Nicoll
30 Apr 24 i   `- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1William Hyde
15 May 24 +- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1Joy Beeson
22 May 24 `- Re: [ReacTor] "Bad Books", and the Readers That Love Them1Default User

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal