Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas
De : lynnmcguire5 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Lynn McGuire)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written rec.arts.comics.strips
Date : 08. May 2024, 01:21:53
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v1egj3$3i1l2$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 5/7/2024 5:48 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-05-07 15:21, Lynn McGuire wrote:
xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas
    https://xkcd.com/2929/
>
We would have lost WWII without leaded gasoline.  The bombers and fighters both required 100+ octane gasoline which was only achievable using massive quantities of tetra-ethyl lead in those days.
 1. You're such a tedious pedant.
 2. You're wrong on the facts.
 While having 100+ octane gasoline made more power possible, if they hadn't had it, engine manufacturers would still have built very effective engines.
Nope.  The best gasoline that the 1930s refineries could produce was 60 octane on a good day with no tetra-ethyl lead additives.  Bad days were 40 octane.  Loaded bombers and fighters needed their superchargers to take off and turbochargers to fly high.  Both of those additions required high octane gasoline back then.  My twin turbocharged truck requires a minimum of 87 octane and likes 90 octane with very modern technology on a V6 engine with up to six sparks per compression cycle and high precision fuel injection.
The refinery cat crackers did not get worked out until the 1960s and the hydrotreaters did not get worked out until the 1970s.  And all of the other refinery additives did not come about until the 1950s at the earliest.
Lynn

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 May 24 * xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas37Lynn McGuire
8 May 24 +* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas2Lynn McGuire
8 May 24 i`- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1D
8 May 24 +* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas4Alan
8 May 24 i+- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1Lynn McGuire
8 May 24 i`* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas2Scott Dorsey
8 May 24 i `- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1Lynn McGuire
8 May 24 +- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1John Savard
8 May 24 +* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas7Robert Woodward
8 May 24 i+- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
8 May 24 i`* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas5Scott Dorsey
9 May 24 i `* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas4Lynn McGuire
10 May 24 i  `* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas3Scott Dorsey
10 May 24 i   +- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1Lynn McGuire
27 May 24 i   `- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1Robert Carnegie
10 May 24 `* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas22Tony Nance
10 May 24  +* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas13ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
10 May 24  i+- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1Tony Nance
10 May 24  i`* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas11Paul S Person
10 May 24  i +- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
10 May 24  i +* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas3Lynn McGuire
11 May 24  i i`* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas2Dimensional Traveler
11 May 24  i i `- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1Lynn McGuire
11 May 24  i +* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas3Dimensional Traveler
11 May 24  i i`* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas2Cryptoengineer
11 May 24  i i `- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan
11 May 24  i `* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas3Paul S Person
11 May 24  i  `* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas2Mark Jackson
12 May 24  i   `- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1Paul S Person
22 May 24  `* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas8Default User
22 May 24   +- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1Scott Dorsey
23 May 24   `* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas6Kevrob
24 May 24    `* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas5Cryptoengineer
24 May 24     `* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas4James Nicoll
25 May 24      `* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas3Titus G
25 May 24       `* Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas2Kevrob
26 May 24        `- Re: xkcd: Good and Bad Ideas1Paul S Person

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal