Re: King Laurin?

Mad Hamish wrote:

Don wrote:

<snip>

The Right Reverend Gregor Mendel OSA is one example of a Catholic
scientist. Mendel founded the modern science of genetics.
   Among its flaws, Darwinism fails to account for Mendelian
inheritance. Here's a re-post of a scientific paper exorcised from
another thread:
>
   Mathematical Challenges to Macroevolution
>
   Abstract
>
   The theory of evolution was advanced by Darwin in 1859, prior
   to Mendel???s experiments demonstrating the particulate nature
   of inheritance. The modern synthesis was formulated in the
   early 1940s, well before the concept of coded information
   was understood. This paper outlines four mathematical
   challenges to the modern synthesis, which are based on
   current understanding of the proposed mechanisms of
   evolutionary change within the constraints of experimental
   molecular biology.
>
   (10.4236/jamp.2022.1011224)
>

Take it to alt.kooks
or try and get it past peer review somewhere

Some particle physics peers arguably act as kooks. But we'll save them
for later. For the time being let's stick to this thread's topic.
    Your doubled down "exorcism of wrong thought" (as you see it) was
reversed to make it easier to see the paper's citation:
(10.4236/jamp.2022.1011224).
Such a citation indicates a peer reviewed paper. For the present case,
_The Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics_ published this paper.

Danke,

--
Don.......My cat's  )\._.,--....,'``.     https://crcomp.net/reviews.php
telltale tall tail /,   _.. \   _\  (`._ ,.    Walk humbly with thy God.
tells tall tales.. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'    Make 1984 fiction again.