Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Five Vintage Works of SF From Women Writers
De : (at) *nospam* ednolan (ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 12. May 2024, 03:23:22
Autres entêtes
Organisation : loft
Message-ID : <laangqFgkokU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
In article <
v1p7tg$m2j$1@panix2.panix.com>,
Scott Dorsey <
kludge@panix.com> wrote:
Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> wrote:
John Savard <quadibloc@servername.invalid> wrote:
While I won't argue your decision not to include it among the five
examples examined in depth, since you make such a claim, and there
might be some who would ignorantly question it... I'm surprised you
did not substantiate your claim with at least a passing mention of
_Frankenstein; or, The Modern Promethius_ by Mary Wollstonecraft
Shelley.
>
Go back and read footnote 1.
>
Footnote 1, hmm? Isn't that the one which involves the resurrection of
the dead?
I think that's footnote 9.
-- columbiaclosings.comWhat's not in Columbia anymore..
Re: (ReacTor) Five Vintage Works of SF From Women Writers
Re: (ReacTor) Five Vintage Works of SF From Women Writers
