Sujet : Re: Nebula Finalists 1985
De : (at) *nospam* ednolan (ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 28. May 2024, 19:54:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : loft
Message-ID : <lbmnjgF7a8qU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
In article <
19p5O.2751$1tf.1794@fx38.iad>,
Scott Lurndal <
slp53@pacbell.net> wrote:
"Michael F. Stemper" <michael.stemper@gmail.com> writes:
On 27/05/2024 09.04, James Nicoll wrote:
In article <v323cl$2c0t$1@dont-email.me>,
Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
On 27/05/2024 07.59, James Nicoll wrote:
This week's Nebula finalists reaches the finalists of 1985! 1985 was
a golden age of Wham! songs, the Coen Brothers' first film debuted,
and a plucky David Miller transformed Ontario government. What of
1985's science fiction?
>
Which 1985 Nebula Finalist Novels Have You Read?
>
Neuromancer by William Gibson
Frontera by Lewis Shiner
Job: A Comedy of Justice by Robert A. Heinlein
The Integral Trees by Larry Niven
The Man Who Melted by Jack Dann
The Wild Shore by Kim Stanley Robinson
>
By cosmic coincidence, I read both _Neuromancer_ and _Job_ in May
of 1993. Gibson no longer darkens my shelves, but I've reread the
Heinlein and may do so again.
What's wrong with Gibson?
>
For me, he's all but unreadable. I struggled through _Neuromancer_ in
1993. Feeling that I should give such a significant author another chance,
the following year I survived _Mona Lisa Overdrive_.
>
I also found Gibson mostly unreadable. Wasn't a fan of Brunner, either,
except for _Polymath_.
>
My favorite as well. I was hoping some of his other books in the same
setting would be as good, but I didn't feel they were. Then he kind of
went all 70s. (Props for _Shockwave Rider_ though).
-- columbiaclosings.comWhat's not in Columbia anymore..