Sujet : Re: Nebula Finalists 1985
De : wthyde1953 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (William Hyde)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 29. May 2024, 21:02:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v381l6$19kpj$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
In article <19p5O.2751$1tf.1794@fx38.iad>,
Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote:
"Michael F. Stemper" <michael.stemper@gmail.com> writes:
On 27/05/2024 09.04, James Nicoll wrote:
In article <v323cl$2c0t$1@dont-email.me>,
Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
On 27/05/2024 07.59, James Nicoll wrote:
This week's Nebula finalists reaches the finalists of 1985! 1985 was
a golden age of Wham! songs, the Coen Brothers' first film debuted,
and a plucky David Miller transformed Ontario government. What of
1985's science fiction?
>
Which 1985 Nebula Finalist Novels Have You Read?
>
Neuromancer by William Gibson
Frontera by Lewis Shiner
Job: A Comedy of Justice by Robert A. Heinlein
The Integral Trees by Larry Niven
The Man Who Melted by Jack Dann
The Wild Shore by Kim Stanley Robinson
>
By cosmic coincidence, I read both _Neuromancer_ and _Job_ in May
of 1993. Gibson no longer darkens my shelves, but I've reread the
Heinlein and may do so again.
>
What's wrong with Gibson?
>
For me, he's all but unreadable. I struggled through _Neuromancer_ in
1993. Feeling that I should give such a significant author another chance,
the following year I survived _Mona Lisa Overdrive_.
>
I also found Gibson mostly unreadable. Wasn't a fan of Brunner, either,
except for _Polymath_.
>
My favorite as well.
With two solid votes for it I may have to try a reread.
The novel did give me one good moment though. One of those annoying SF-belittling types saw my copy and tried to make fun of an SF book featuring a made-up kind of mathematics.
I explained to him that to appreciate SF it helps to know what various words mean.
William Hyde
I was hoping some of his other books in the same
setting would be as good, but I didn't feel they were. Then he kind of
went all 70s. (Props for _Shockwave Rider_ though).