Sujet : Re: (ReacTor) Five Works of SF Inspired by Pseudoscience
De : davidd02 (at) *nospam* tpg.com.au (David Duffy)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 31. May 2024, 01:18:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v3b50u$1tgd9$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-107-generic (x86_64))
James Nicoll <
jdnicoll@panix.com> wrote:
Five Works of SF Inspired by Pseudoscience
Some good (or at least interesting) SF has been based on truly
bonkers pseudoscience.
https://reactormag.com/five-works-of-sf-inspired-by-pseudoscience/
Lots of great art based on bonkers systems down the millenia - as
long as they make a nice pattern.
But this is tangled up by the demarcation problem (beloved of
philosophers of science). Recall that the recent flap about
a replication problem in science started around:
Bem DJ: Feeling the future: experimental evidence for anomalous
retroactive influences on cognition and affect. J Pers Soc
Psychol. 2011;100(3):407???425.
and even
Bem D, Tressoldi P, Rabeyron T, and Duggan M.
Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous
anticipation of random future events F1000Res. 2015; 4: 1188
I don't kmow why people weren't more suspicious of a man called Bem.
Cheers, David Duffy.