Sujet : Re: Top 10 Space Opera Books and Series
De : psperson (at) *nospam* old.netcom.invalid (Paul S Person)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 03. Jun 2024, 16:30:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <k0or5jdei3iel5ch73hl0rn09spdju352e@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 08:02:34 -0500, "Michael F. Stemper"
<
michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
On 02/06/2024 10.55, Paul S Person wrote:
<snippo>
I think I've mostly regarded "space opera" as a formation based on
"horse opera". FWIW. YMMV.
>
I have no doubt about that being the etymology of the term. But, it's hardly
a definition. And I was wondering specifically about the definition used by
the folks setting up the poll; the definition that viewed Hyperion and
Foundation as "space opera".
OK, here's what
<
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horse_opera#:~:text=A%20horse%20opera%2C%20hoss%20opera%2C%20oat%20opera%20or,used%20variously%20to%20convey%20either%20disparagement%20or%20affection>
has to say:
"A horse opera, hoss opera, oat opera or oater is a Western film or
television series that is clichéd or formulaic, in the manner of a
(later) soap opera or space opera.
"The term, which was originally coined by silent film-era Western star
William S. Hart, is used variously to convey either disparagement or
affection. The term "horse opera" is quite loosely defined; it does
not specify a distinct sub-genre of the Western (as "space opera" does
with regard to the science fiction genre)."
And that's the entire content. So, a space opera is to a horse opera
as science fiction is to westerns.
And the definition of a "horse opera" is that it is "clichéd or
formulaic". Sounds about right for SF as well.
Huh. I was expecting to hear about the Fat Lady singing.
-- "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,Who evil spoke of everyone but God,Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"