Re: [OT] Solution Proposed for Big Physics Question

Liste des GroupesRevenir à ras written 
Sujet : Re: [OT] Solution Proposed for Big Physics Question
De : mailbox (at) *nospam* cpacker.org (Charles Packer)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.written
Date : 15. Jun 2024, 09:01:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <pan$ac061$eff3efbc$52944ad4$19e5894c@cpacker.org>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; )
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 03:03:54 -0600, John Savard wrote:

On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:05:27 -0000 (UTC), Charles Packer
<mailbox@cpacker.org> wrote:
 
I scrolled down through this page and found this "See also"
>
Pentagon's UAP Task Force to Gain Broader Access to Intelligence on UFOs
>
https://thedebrief.org/pentagons-uap-task-force-to-gain-broader-access-
to-
intelligence-on-aerial-threats/
>
Others may get a different "See also" -- Does mine say something about
me?
 
Yes, it does. But what it says is not clear. It could say any one of the
following things:
 
1. You are a true believer that the Earth is currently being visited by
alien spacecraft.
 
2. You could like your privacy, and have configured your browser to
block all tracking cookies; therefore, the "See also" was chosen
completely at random.
 
3. Although you don't take UFOs at all seriously, sometime in the last
year or so, on one occasion, you broke down and clicked on a lilnk about
them because you were curious about what crazy notion they came up with
this time, and thought it would be good for a laugh.
 
In my opinion, alternative 3 is the most probable.


Today I got this one instead:
 Annexation Won’t Help Russian Industry Recover Staggering Losses of
Military Drones, Moscow Admits

What does this say about the quality of the website -- and the
content of the article in question?


Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Jun 24 * [OT] Solution Proposed for Big Physics Question4John Savard
14 Jun 24 `* Re: [OT] Solution Proposed for Big Physics Question3Charles Packer
14 Jun 24  `* Re: [OT] Solution Proposed for Big Physics Question2John Savard
15 Jun 24   `- Re: [OT] Solution Proposed for Big Physics Question1Charles Packer

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal