Re: OT NASA CHAPEA Mars Simulation.

On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 18:07:25 -0400, Tony Nance <tnusenet17@gmail.com>
wrote:

On 7/18/24 11:27 PM, Titus G wrote:

On 19/07/24 04:57, Robert Carnegie wrote:

On 10/07/2024 05:39, Titus G wrote:

Four volunteers have spent 378 days living in a 1,700-square-foot space
3D-printed by NASA to simulate conditions on Mars. Fascinating.
"The volunteers grew their own vegetables, maintained equipment,
participated in so-called Marswalks and faced stressors that actual
space travelers to Mars could experience, including 22-minute
communication delays with Earth."
https://www.npr.org/2024/07/07/nx-s1-5032120/nasa-mars-simulation-volunteers-year
>
Four people in 1700 square feet for over a year? (If it was a SF story,
at least two of them would have gone mad or been killed.)
What about water? Gravity?

>
There have been previous exercises.

 
Thank you.
 

>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_2

 
Over 3 acres.
 

>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HI-SEAS

 
Wow. 6 people in a smaller area.
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MARS-500

 
Similar. 6 people but a period of 520 days.
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_Running
>
:-)

 
Not a simulation. 1 person with a 4 person spaceship to himself for a
fairly short time.
 

>
>
"All models are wrong, but some are useful." - George Box
>
Generally: it is often impossible and/or unreasonable to do an identical
simulation, model, practice run, etc. That does not mean these things
will not yield insightful results or info. (It does not mean they will,
either.)
>
I haven't looked into any details about the above-mentioned stuff, so I
have no idea what valuable info can be gleaned (if any); but I'd want to
know more before rejecting them out of hand.

/Silent Running/ is a motion picture, a work of fiction.

It is not a simulation.

That is why it can, indeed, be rejected out-of-hand.
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"