Sujet : Re: Today's interesting development
De : jdnicoll (at) *nospam* panix.com (James Nicoll)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 23. Jul 2024, 18:19:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Public Access Networks Corp.
Message-ID : <v7oomt$ha9$1@reader1.panix.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
v7olas$dc9$1@reader1.panix.com>,
James Nicoll <
jdnicoll@panix.com> wrote:
In article <v7okdl$197vv$1@dont-email.me>,
Ahasuerus <ahasuerus@email.com> wrote:
On 7/22/2024 9:19 PM, James Nicoll wrote:
In article <v7mr1t$s1a5$1@dont-email.me>,
Ahasuerus <ahasuerus@email.com> wrote:
On 7/22/2024 4:01 PM, James Nicoll wrote:
Someone spent $19,000 dollars to stuff the Hugo Award ballot
box in a way that seems either very, very ineptly or in a
manner calculated to be spotted.
>
https://glasgow2024.org/hugo-awards/statement-22-july-2024/
>
Now, I do recall a case in the 1980s, I think, where an exuberant
fan tried to buy a story he liked a Hugo, using consecutively
numbered traveller's checks to buy memberships. So people do
fuck up comprehensively. But it could also be someone really dislikes
Finalist A and wanted to make them look bad.
>
Or -- conceivably -- someone who dislikes the Hugo award as an institution.
What a half-assed attack, then.
>
Perhaps it was more along the lines of George Bernard Shaw's dictum
about wrestling with pigs:
>
"You both get dirty and the pig likes it."
>
Or "If we throw enough mud at the wall some of it will stick".
>
Just at this second, it looks like it might be SF's version of the
Black Sox Scandal.
>
Which is to say, some gambler dropped 20K trying to fix a contest on
which he was voting.
-- My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll