Sujet : Re: (Worst) Farnham's Freehold by Robert A. Heinlein
De : usenet (at) *nospam* mikevanpelt.com (Mike Van Pelt)
Groupes : rec.arts.sf.writtenDate : 24. Jul 2024, 07:17:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v7q6a7$1kf4b$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
In article <
v7ptca$1jcdp$1@dont-email.me>,
Lynn McGuire <
lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/23/2024 8:04 AM, James Nicoll wrote:
Farnham's Freehold by Robert A. Heinlein
Can atomic Commiegeddon and the end of the world distract comely young
Barbara from the allure of irresistibly middle-aged Hugh Farnham's
interminable lectures? And what of the Race Question?
https://jamesdavisnicoll.com/review/sic-transit-gloria-mundi
>
And what of the cannibalism question ?
It seems clear to me that the cannibalism was included so Heinlein
could make the statment through Farnham that slavery was a worse
evil than cannibalism.
-- Mike Van Pelt | "I don't advise it unless you're nuts."mvp at calweb.com | -- Ray Wilkinson, after riding out HurricaneKE6BVH | Ike on Surfside Beach in Galveston